Radeon 760M vs Quadro RTX 5000

#ad 
Buy
Quadro RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 5000 Quadro RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000 Passive Quadro RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000 Passive Quadro RTX 8100 Quadro RTX 8200
VS
Radeon 520 Radeon 530 Radeon 540X Radeon 610 Radeon 610M Radeon 660M Radeon 680M Radeon 740M Radeon 760M Radeon 780M Radeon 880M Radeon 890M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 5000 with Radeon 760M, including specs and performance data.

RTX 5000
2018
16 GB GDDR6, 230 Watt
35.11
+176%

RTX 5000 outperforms 760M by a whopping 176% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RTX 5000 RTX 5000
Radeon 760M Radeon 760M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking107371
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.83no data
Power efficiency12.1067.30
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameTU104Hawx Point
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)6 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072512
Core clock speed1620 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1815 MHz2599 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate348.583.17
Floating-point processing power11.15 TFLOPS5.323 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs19232
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores488

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 5000 35.11
+176%
Radeon 760M 12.74

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 5000 15689
+176%
Radeon 760M 5691

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD80−85
+167%
30
−167%
1440p45−50
+150%
18
−150%

Cost per frame, $

1080p28.74no data
1440p51.09no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 39
+0%
39
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 105
+0%
105
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 29
+0%
29
+0%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 77
+0%
77
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
+0%
24
+0%
Far Cry 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 17
+0%
17
+0%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 33
+0%
33
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%
Dota 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35
+0%
35
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
+0%
36
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 33
+0%
33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
+0%
23
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16
+0%
16
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how RTX 5000 and Radeon 760M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 is 167% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5000 is 150% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 35.11 12.74
Recency 13 August 2018 6 December 2023
Chip lithography 12 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 15 Watt

RTX 5000 has a 175.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 760M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 200% more advanced lithography process, and 1433.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 760M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 is a workstation card while Radeon 760M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Quadro RTX 5000
AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 5000 Quadro RTX 5000
vs
Pro V620 Radeon Pro V620
Radeon 760M Radeon 760M
vs
GTX 970M GeForce GTX 970M
RTX 5000 Quadro RTX 5000
vs
Pro Vega II Radeon Pro Vega II
K6000 SDI K6000 SDI
vs
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
RTX 6000 RTX 6000
vs
RX 580 2048SP RX 580 2048SP
RTX 6000 RTX 6000
vs
UHD Graphics P750 UHD Graphics P750
R9 A375 R9 A375
vs
RTX 5060 Ti RTX 5060 Ti
RTX 5000 RTX 5000
vs
Arc A350M Arc A350M
P2000 Max-Q P2000 Max-Q
vs
GT 705 OEM GT 705 OEM
P2000 Max-Q P2000 Max-Q
vs
T1200 Max-Q T1200 Max-Q
RX 590 RX 590
vs
MX570 A MX570 A
RX 590 RX 590
vs
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X
vs
RX 7950 XTX RX 7950 XTX

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 222 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 254 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 5000 or Radeon 760M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.