Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs Quadro RTX 5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 5000 Quadro RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000 Passive Quadro RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000 Passive Quadro RTX 8100 Quadro RTX 8200
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 5000 with Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 5000
2018
16 GB GDDR6, 230 Watt
41.36
+14.8%

RTX 5000 outperforms RTX 5000 Mobile by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RTX 5000 RTX 5000
RTX 5000 Mobile RTX 5000 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking97132
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.24no data
Power efficiency12.5322.84
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU104TU104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30723072
Core clock speed1620 MHz1035 MHz
Boost clock speed1815 MHz1545 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate348.5296.6
Floating-point processing power11.15 TFLOPS9.492 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs192192
Tensor Cores384384
Ray Tracing Cores4848

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.57.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD150−160
+12.8%
133
−12.8%
1440p90−95
+13.9%
79
−13.9%
4K55−60
+12.2%
49
−12.2%

Cost per frame, $

1080p15.33no data
1440p25.54no data
4K41.80no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 104
+0%
104
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 125
+0%
125
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Hitman 3 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 113
+0%
113
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 118
+0%
118
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Hitman 3 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 99
+0%
99
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 73
+0%
73
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 88
+0%
88
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Hitman 3 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100
+0%
100
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 108
+0%
108
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 63
+0%
63
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 66
+0%
66
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Hitman 3 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90
+0%
90
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hitman 3 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Metro Exodus 76
+0%
76
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+0%
71
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40
+0%
40
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 38
+0%
38
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50
+0%
50
+0%

This is how RTX 5000 and RTX 5000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 is 13% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5000 is 14% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5000 is 12% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 41.36 36.04
Recency 13 August 2018 27 May 2019
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 110 Watt

RTX 5000 has a 14.8% higher aggregate performance score.

RTX 5000 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and 109.1% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 is a workstation card while Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Quadro RTX 5000
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 5000 Quadro RTX 5000
vs
Pro W6600 Radeon Pro W6600
RTX 5000 Mobile Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
vs
Pro Vega 64X Radeon Pro Vega 64X
RTX 5000 Quadro RTX 5000
vs
Pro Vega II Radeon Pro Vega II
R9 290X Radeon R9 290X
vs
ATI HD 4850 Radeon HD 4850
GTX 1650 Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
vs
Graphics 512SP Mobile Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile
R5 240 OEM Radeon R5 240 OEM
vs
HD Graphics P4000 HD Graphics P4000
GTX 1050 Ti GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
vs
W6150M FirePro W6150M
HD Graphics 5000 HD Graphics 5000
vs
ATI X1900 GT Radeon X1900 GT
GTX 960M GeForce GTX 960M
vs
RTX 2070 Super Mobile GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
HD 8470D Radeon HD 8470D
vs
RX 5700 Radeon RX 5700
Switch GPU 16nm Switch GPU 16nm
vs
Instinct MI300 Radeon Instinct MI300
R9 280X Radeon R9 280X
vs
Radeon 610M Radeon 610M
GTX 1080 11Gbps GeForce GTX 1080 11Gbps
vs
RX 5950 XT Radeon RX 5950 XT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 204 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 34 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.