Quadro P2000 Mobile vs Quadro RTX 5000
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro RTX 5000 with Quadro P2000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.
RTX 5000 outperforms P2000 Mobile by a whopping 164% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 98 | 344 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 14.33 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 12.36 | 14.35 |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | TU104 | GP106 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 13 August 2018 (6 years ago) | 15 February 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,299 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3072 | 1152 |
| Core clock speed | 1620 MHz | 1291 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1291 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 13,600 million | 4,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 230 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 348.5 | 92.95 |
| Floating-point processing power | 11.15 TFLOPS | 2.974 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 32 |
| TMUs | 192 | 72 |
| Tensor Cores | 384 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 3.75 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 1502 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 96.13 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | 6.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 41.46 | 15.70 |
| Recency | 13 August 2018 | 15 February 2019 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 3.75 GB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 230 Watt | 75 Watt |
RTX 5000 has a 164.1% higher aggregate performance score, a 326.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.
P2000 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and 206.7% lower power consumption.
The Quadro RTX 5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P2000 Mobile in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 is a workstation card while Quadro P2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
