GeForce 9200M vs Quadro RTX 5000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	97	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	14.24	no data
Power efficiency	12.53	no data
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code name	TU104	C79
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	13 August 2018 (6 years ago)	15 October 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,299	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	16
Core clock speed	1620 MHz	450 MHz
Boost clock speed	1815 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	13,600 million	314 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	230 Watt	12 Watt
Texture fill rate	348.5	3.600
Floating-point processing power	11.15 TFLOPS	0.0384 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	4
TMUs	192	8
Tensor Cores	384	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	48	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	256 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	6.5	4.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	13 August 2018	15 October 2008
Chip lithography	12 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	230 Watt	12 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---