Quadro T2000 Mobile vs Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and Quadro T2000 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 5000 Mobile
2019
16 GB GDDR6, 110 Watt
36.19
+74.2%

RTX 5000 Mobile outperforms T2000 Mobile by an impressive 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking135269
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.6523.83
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU104TU117
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30721024
Core clock speed1035 MHz1575 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate296.6114.2
Floating-point processing power9.492 TFLOPS3.656 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs19264
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.57.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 5000 Mobile 36.19
+74.2%
T2000 Mobile 20.77

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 5000 Mobile 24620
+82.1%
T2000 Mobile 13524

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD131
+74.7%
75−80
−74.7%
1440p83
+84.4%
45−50
−84.4%
4K52
+92.6%
27−30
−92.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+100%
35−40
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+87.8%
40−45
−87.8%
Elden Ring 120−130
+89.4%
65−70
−89.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−105
+51.5%
65−70
−51.5%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+100%
35−40
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+87.8%
40−45
−87.8%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+95.5%
85−90
−95.5%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+57.1%
55−60
−57.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 113
+140%
45−50
−140%
Valorant 200
+138%
80−85
−138%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−105
+51.5%
65−70
−51.5%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+100%
35−40
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+87.8%
40−45
−87.8%
Dota 2 33
−121%
70−75
+121%
Elden Ring 120−130
+89.4%
65−70
−89.4%
Far Cry 5 77
+13.2%
65−70
−13.2%
Fortnite 160−170
+48.6%
100−110
−48.6%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+95.5%
85−90
−95.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+57.5%
70−75
−57.5%
Metro Exodus 39
−43.6%
55−60
+43.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+40.6%
130−140
−40.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 71
+51.1%
45−50
−51.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+90.9%
65−70
−90.9%
Valorant 130
+54.8%
80−85
−54.8%
World of Tanks 270−280
+18.2%
230−240
−18.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−105
+51.5%
65−70
−51.5%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+100%
35−40
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+87.8%
40−45
−87.8%
Dota 2 92
+26%
70−75
−26%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+36.8%
65−70
−36.8%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+95.5%
85−90
−95.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+40.6%
130−140
−40.6%
Valorant 181
+115%
80−85
−115%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 65−70
+100%
30−35
−100%
Elden Ring 70−75
+106%
35−40
−106%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+94.1%
30−35
−94.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+1.7%
170−180
−1.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 44
+132%
18−20
−132%
World of Tanks 230−240
+64.3%
140−150
−64.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+61.9%
40−45
−61.9%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+106%
16−18
−106%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+106%
16−18
−106%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+104%
55−60
−104%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+90.7%
50−55
−90.7%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+70.2%
45−50
−70.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+110%
27−30
−110%
Valorant 129
+139%
50−55
−139%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+118%
16−18
−118%
Dota 2 65−70
+97.1%
35−40
−97.1%
Elden Ring 30−35
+127%
14−16
−127%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+97.1%
35−40
−97.1%
Metro Exodus 37
+147%
14−16
−147%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+87.1%
60−65
−87.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 28
+115%
12−14
−115%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+97.1%
35−40
−97.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+95.2%
21−24
−95.2%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+118%
16−18
−118%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Dota 2 65−70
+97.1%
35−40
−97.1%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+92.6%
27−30
−92.6%
Fortnite 50−55
+100%
24−27
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+90.3%
30−35
−90.3%
Valorant 69
+176%
24−27
−176%

This is how RTX 5000 Mobile and T2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Mobile is 75% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5000 Mobile is 84% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5000 Mobile is 93% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 5000 Mobile is 176% faster.
  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 121% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Mobile is ahead in 61 test (97%)
  • T2000 Mobile is ahead in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.19 20.77
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 60 Watt

RTX 5000 Mobile has a 74.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T2000 Mobile, on the other hand, has 83.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T2000 Mobile in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Quadro T2000 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 36 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 398 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.