Radeon R5 (Carrizo) vs Quadro RTX 4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
4000 5000 6000 6000 Passive 8000 8000 Passive 8100 8200
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
(Beema/Carrizo-L) (Bristol Ridge) (Carrizo) (Kaveri) (Stoney Ridge) A230 A330 A335 M230 M230 Rebrand M240 M240 Rebrand M255 M315 M320 M330 M335 M420 M430 M435 Mobile Graphics

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 4000 with Radeon R5 (Carrizo), including specs and performance data.

RTX 4000
2018, $899
8 GB GDDR6, 160 Watt
35.62
+1995%

RTX 4000 outperforms R5 (Carrizo) by a whopping 1995% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX 4000 RTX 4000
R5 (Carrizo) R5 (Carrizo)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking157990
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.29no data
Power efficiency17.143.74
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameTU104Carrizo
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 November 2018 (7 years ago)4 June 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$899 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304256
Core clock speed1005 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1545 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million2410 Million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt12-35 Watt
Texture fill rate222.5no data
Floating-point processing power7.119 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs144no data
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data
L1 Cache2.3 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed1625 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth416.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-Cno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (FL 12_0)
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 49 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 35.62 1.70
Recency 13 November 2018 4 June 2015
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 12 Watt

RTX 4000 has a 1995% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 133% more advanced lithography process.

R5 (Carrizo), on the other hand, has 1233% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 (Carrizo) in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R5 (Carrizo) is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
Pro W6600 Radeon Pro W6600
R5 (Carrizo) Radeon R5 (Carrizo)
vs
HD Graphics 4600 HD Graphics 4600
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
Pro W6800X Duo Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
Qualcomm Adreno 690 Adreno 690
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
RX 7600S RX 7600S
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
Jetson Xavier NX 8 GB Jetson Xavier NX 8 GB
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
Jetson AGX Xavier 16 GB Jetson AGX Xavier 16 GB
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
HD 8770M HD 8770M
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
R5 (Kaveri) R5 (Kaveri)
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
HD 7590M HD 7590M
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
FirePro M2000 FirePro M2000
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
HD 7500G HD 7500G
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
GTX 570 GTX 570

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 530 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 6 votes

Rate Radeon R5 (Carrizo) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 4000 or Radeon R5 (Carrizo), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.