GeForce MX150 vs Quadro RTX 4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 4000 with GeForce MX150, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4000
2018
8 GB GDDR6, 160 Watt
34.06
+573%

RTX 4000 outperforms MX150 by a whopping 573% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking123610
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation37.54no data
Power efficiency16.8740.10
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameTU104GP108
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 November 2018 (6 years ago)17 May 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$899 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304384
Core clock speed1005 MHz937 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHz1038 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate222.524.91
Floating-point processing power7.119 TFLOPS0.7972 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs14424
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1625 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth416.0 GB/s40.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.56.1
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 4000 34.06
+573%
GeForce MX150 5.06

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4000 15222
+573%
GeForce MX150 2262

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

RTX 4000 85176
+787%
GeForce MX150 9608

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

RTX 4000 78669
+858%
GeForce MX150 8215

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

RTX 4000 94250
+862%
GeForce MX150 9799

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD180−190
+567%
27
−567%
1440p200−210
+567%
30
−567%
4K120−130
+532%
19
−532%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.99no data
1440p4.50no data
4K7.49no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Battlefield 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+0%
11
+0%
Far Cry 5 17
+0%
17
+0%
Fortnite 59
+0%
59
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 25
+0%
25
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 26
+0%
26
+0%
Valorant 100
+0%
100
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Battlefield 5 32
+0%
32
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 87
+0%
87
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+0%
7
+0%
Dota 2 68
+0%
68
+0%
Far Cry 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Fortnite 34
+0%
34
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21
+0%
21
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 26
+0%
26
+0%
Metro Exodus 6
+0%
6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 22
+0%
22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+0%
19
+0%
Valorant 100
+0%
100
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Dota 2 62
+0%
62
+0%
Far Cry 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14
+0%
14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 15
+0%
15
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
+0%
11
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24
+0%
24
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55
+0%
55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 43
+0%
43
+0%
Valorant 66
+0%
66
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30
+0%
30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Valorant 33
+0%
33
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 24
+0%
24
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how RTX 4000 and GeForce MX150 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 is 567% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 is 567% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 is 532% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 test (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.06 5.06
Recency 13 November 2018 17 May 2017
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 10 Watt

RTX 4000 has a 573.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce MX150, on the other hand, has 1500% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX150 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 is a workstation card while GeForce MX150 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Quadro RTX 4000
NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GeForce MX150

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 498 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1674 votes

Rate GeForce MX150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 4000 or GeForce MX150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.