GeForce 9650M GT vs Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking150not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.52no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameTU104G96C
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)19 August 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256032
Core clock speed1110 MHz550 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate249.68.800
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPS0.0848 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs16016
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-II

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Maximum VGA resolutionno data1920x1200
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 4000 Mobile 56250
+4207%
9650M GT 1306

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2019 19 August 2008
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 23 Watt

RTX 4000 Mobile has an age advantage of 10 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 358.3% more advanced lithography process.

9650M GT, on the other hand, has 378.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and GeForce 9650M GT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce 9650M GT is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
GeForce 9650M GT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 30 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 7 votes

Rate GeForce 9650M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.