RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile with RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3000 Mobile
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
26.25

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms RTX 3000 Mobile by an impressive 77% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking21073
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data83.53
Power efficiency22.4945.43
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU106AD107
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042816
Core clock speed945 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speed1380 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate198.7187.4
Floating-point processing power6.359 TFLOPS12 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs14488
Tensor Cores28888
Ray Tracing Cores3622

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.58.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3000 Mobile 26.25
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 46.39
+76.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3000 Mobile 10116
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17876
+76.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD104
−73.1%
180−190
+73.1%
4K88
−70.5%
150−160
+70.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.61
4Kno data4.33

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−74.4%
75−80
+74.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 77
−68.8%
130−140
+68.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
−66.7%
75−80
+66.7%
Battlefield 5 85−90
−74.4%
150−160
+74.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−69.8%
90−95
+69.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−74.4%
75−80
+74.4%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−66.7%
100−105
+66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−76.5%
120−130
+76.5%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−72.2%
260−270
+72.2%
Hitman 3 50−55
−69.8%
90−95
+69.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
−75%
210−220
+75%
Metro Exodus 90−95
−66.7%
150−160
+66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
−76.5%
120−130
+76.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
−68.5%
150−160
+68.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−69.8%
180−190
+69.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
−75.4%
100−105
+75.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
−66.7%
75−80
+66.7%
Battlefield 5 85−90
−74.4%
150−160
+74.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−69.8%
90−95
+69.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−74.4%
75−80
+74.4%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−66.7%
100−105
+66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−76.5%
120−130
+76.5%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−72.2%
260−270
+72.2%
Hitman 3 50−55
−69.8%
90−95
+69.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
−75%
210−220
+75%
Metro Exodus 90−95
−66.7%
150−160
+66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
−76.5%
120−130
+76.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
−68.5%
150−160
+68.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−69.6%
95−100
+69.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−69.8%
180−190
+69.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 39
−66.7%
65−70
+66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
−66.7%
75−80
+66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−69.8%
90−95
+69.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−74.4%
75−80
+74.4%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−66.7%
100−105
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−72.2%
260−270
+72.2%
Hitman 3 50−55
−69.8%
90−95
+69.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
−75%
210−220
+75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
−68.5%
150−160
+68.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56
−69.6%
95−100
+69.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−69.8%
180−190
+69.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
−76.5%
120−130
+76.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−70%
85−90
+70%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−75%
70−75
+75%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−66.7%
45−50
+66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−73.1%
45−50
+73.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−73.3%
260−270
+73.3%
Hitman 3 30−35
−61.3%
50−55
+61.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−75.9%
95−100
+75.9%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−70%
85−90
+70%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−72.4%
100−105
+72.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−66.7%
55−60
+66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
−71.2%
250−260
+71.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−70.5%
75−80
+70.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−73.1%
45−50
+73.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
Hitman 3 21−24
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
−71.6%
230−240
+71.6%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−72.4%
50−55
+72.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−66.7%
60−65
+66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−71.9%
55−60
+71.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−73.9%
40−45
+73.9%

This is how RTX 3000 Mobile and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 73% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 70% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.25 46.39
Recency 27 May 2019 12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has a 76.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 14.3% lower power consumption.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 288 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 27 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.