Radeon RX 6800 XT vs Quadro P620

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P620 with Radeon RX 6800 XT, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P620
2018
2 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
9.42

RX 6800 XT outperforms P620 by a whopping 589% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking46728
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data50.47
Power efficiency16.3014.98
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP107Navi 21
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 February 2018 (6 years ago)28 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5124608
Core clock speed1177 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speed1443 MHz2250 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate46.18648.0
Floating-point processing power1.478 TFLOPS20.74 TFLOPS
ROPs16128
TMUs32288
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mm267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P620 9.42
RX 6800 XT 64.91
+589%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P620 3636
RX 6800 XT 25043
+589%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro P620 5909
RX 6800 XT 52046
+781%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro P620 25105
RX 6800 XT 96516
+284%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P620 4673
RX 6800 XT 49735
+964%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P620 30410
RX 6800 XT 193053
+535%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P620 310112
RX 6800 XT 504438
+62.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD44
−364%
204
+364%
1440p18−21
−700%
144
+700%
4K12−14
−675%
93
+675%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.18
1440pno data4.51
4Kno data6.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−733%
120−130
+733%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−483%
130−140
+483%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−1029%
158
+1029%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−610%
200−210
+610%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−511%
110−120
+511%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−733%
120−130
+733%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−423%
110−120
+423%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−504%
150−160
+504%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−270%
230−240
+270%
Hitman 3 18−20
−633%
132
+633%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−362%
240−250
+362%
Metro Exodus 35
−311%
144
+311%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−369%
122
+369%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55
−387%
260−270
+387%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−407%
309
+407%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−483%
130−140
+483%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−864%
135
+864%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−610%
200−210
+610%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−511%
110−120
+511%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−733%
120−130
+733%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−423%
110−120
+423%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−504%
150−160
+504%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−270%
230−240
+270%
Hitman 3 18−20
−656%
136
+656%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−362%
240−250
+362%
Metro Exodus 28
−414%
144
+414%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−358%
110−120
+358%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−1045%
355
+1045%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−427%
130−140
+427%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−407%
309
+407%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−483%
130−140
+483%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−743%
118
+743%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−511%
110−120
+511%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−733%
120−130
+733%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−423%
110−120
+423%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−270%
230−240
+270%
Hitman 3 18−20
−578%
122
+578%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−437%
279
+437%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−874%
302
+874%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−841%
160
+841%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−83.6%
112
+83.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−362%
120
+362%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−728%
140−150
+728%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−629%
100−110
+629%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−733%
75−80
+733%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−1860%
98
+1860%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−744%
75−80
+744%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1550%
65−70
+1550%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−591%
75−80
+591%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−561%
270−280
+561%
Hitman 3 12−14
−777%
114
+777%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−975%
215
+975%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−762%
112
+762%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−1918%
222
+1918%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1167%
110−120
+1167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−423%
314
+423%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−625%
116
+625%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−767%
75−80
+767%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−814%
60−65
+814%
Hitman 3 5−6
−1020%
55−60
+1020%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−474%
220−230
+474%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−1700%
126
+1700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−1471%
110
+1471%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−940%
50−55
+940%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−1525%
65
+1525%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1075%
45−50
+1075%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3000%
30−35
+3000%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−783%
100−110
+783%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−2117%
133
+2117%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−1533%
49
+1533%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−744%
76
+744%

This is how Quadro P620 and RX 6800 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6800 XT is 364% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6800 XT is 700% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6800 XT is 675% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6800 XT is 3000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6800 XT surpassed Quadro P620 in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.42 64.91
Recency 1 February 2018 28 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 300 Watt

Quadro P620 has 650% lower power consumption.

RX 6800 XT, on the other hand, has a 589.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P620 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P620 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6800 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P620
Quadro P620
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
Radeon RX 6800 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 607 votes

Rate Quadro P620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3453 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.