Quadro T1000 Mobile vs P6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P6000 with Quadro T1000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P6000
2016
24 GB 384-bit, 250 Watt
39.18
+131%

Quadro P6000 outperforms T1000 Mobile by a whopping 131% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking103301
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation19.514.27
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameGP102N19P-Q1
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date1 October 2016 (7 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 no data
Current price$989 (0.2x MSRP)$1890

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P6000 has 357% better value for money than T1000 Mobile.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840768
Core clock speed1506 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate394.869.84
Floating-point performance12,634 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P6000 and Quadro T1000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 8-pinno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type384 BitGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount24 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed9016 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 432 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin StereoNo outputs
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Sync IIno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA6.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P6000 39.18
+131%
T1000 Mobile 16.93

P6000 outperforms T1000 Mobile by 131% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P6000 15132
+131%
T1000 Mobile 6540

P6000 outperforms T1000 Mobile by 131% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD140−150
+119%
64
−119%
4K110−120
+129%
48
−129%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48
+167%
18−20
−167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+133%
12−14
−133%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+162%
21−24
−162%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 53
+152%
21−24
−152%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Far Cry 5 49
+133%
21−24
−133%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+156%
18−20
−156%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+163%
30−33
−163%
Hitman 3 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+148%
27−30
−148%
Metro Exodus 83
+137%
35−40
−137%
Red Dead Redemption 2 67
+148%
27−30
−148%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+157%
21−24
−157%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+152%
21−24
−152%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 43
+139%
18−20
−139%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+133%
12−14
−133%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+162%
21−24
−162%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 47
+161%
18−20
−161%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Far Cry 5 41
+156%
16−18
−156%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+156%
18−20
−156%
Forza Horizon 4 114
+153%
45−50
−153%
Hitman 3 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+148%
27−30
−148%
Metro Exodus 54
+157%
21−24
−157%
Red Dead Redemption 2 58
+142%
24−27
−142%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+157%
21−24
−157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
+133%
27−30
−133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+152%
21−24
−152%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 29
+142%
12−14
−142%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+133%
12−14
−133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 32
+167%
12−14
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Far Cry 5 31
+158%
12−14
−158%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+163%
30−33
−163%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+148%
27−30
−148%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+157%
21−24
−157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+150%
14−16
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+152%
21−24
−152%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50
+138%
21−24
−138%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+133%
12−14
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%
Hitman 3 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+143%
14−16
−143%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+133%
12−14
−133%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Hitman 3 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+156%
9−10
−156%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%

This is how Quadro P6000 and T1000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P6000 is 119% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P6000 is 129% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.18 16.93
Recency 1 October 2016 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 50 Watt

The Quadro P6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation card while Quadro T1000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Quadro P6000
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
Quadro T1000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 85 votes

Rate Quadro P6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 134 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.