GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs Quadro P6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P102-101 Quadro P6000 Tesla P10 Tesla P40
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1650 Mobile GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P6000 with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P6000
2016
24 GB 384-bit, 250 Watt
39.99
+97.2%

P6000 outperforms GTX 1650 Ti Mobile by an impressive 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking107274
Place by popularitynot in top-10062
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.11no data
Power efficiency11.0127.92
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP102TU116
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 October 2016 (8 years ago)23 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38401024
Core clock speed1506 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz1485 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate394.895.04
Floating-point processing power12.63 TFLOPS3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs24064

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type384 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1127 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 432 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortNo outputs
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Sync IIno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.140
CUDA6.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P6000 39.99
+97.2%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.28

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P6000 15373
+97.2%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−120
+89.7%
58
−89.7%
1440p80−85
+86%
43
−86%
4K45−50
+80%
25
−80%

Cost per frame, $

1080p54.54no data
1440p74.99no data
4K133.31no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 42
+0%
42
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 59
+0%
59
+0%
Elden Ring 57
+0%
57
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 36
+0%
36
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+0%
40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95
+0%
95
+0%
Metro Exodus 66
+0%
66
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 44
+0%
44
+0%
Valorant 98
+0%
98
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30
+0%
30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+0%
32
+0%
Dota 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Elden Ring 73
+0%
73
+0%
Far Cry 5 70
+0%
70
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75
+0%
75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+0%
76
+0%
Metro Exodus 45
+0%
45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 29
+0%
29
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 48
+0%
48
+0%
World of Tanks 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 29
+0%
29
+0%
Dota 2 112
+0%
112
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 63
+0%
63
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Elden Ring 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 17
+0%
17
+0%
World of Tanks 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+0%
16
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Elden Ring 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 22
+0%
22
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6
+0%
Dota 2 52
+0%
52
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

This is how Quadro P6000 and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P6000 is 90% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P6000 is 86% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P6000 is 80% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 39.99 20.28
Recency 1 October 2016 23 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 50 Watt

Quadro P6000 has a 97.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Quadro P6000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Pro W6600 Radeon Pro W6600
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
vs
Radeon 880M Radeon 880M
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
GT 1030 GeForce GT 1030
vs
HD Graphics P4700 HD Graphics P4700
FirePro W5100 FirePro W5100
vs
Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile
FirePro V4900 FirePro V4900
vs
HD Graphics 2000 HD Graphics 2000
Quadro P1000 Quadro P1000
vs
NVS 295 Quadro NVS 295
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2000
vs
RX 6550M Radeon RX 6550M
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Radeon 780M Radeon 780M
Tesla P40 Tesla P40
vs
RX 6400 Radeon RX 6400
Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
vs
Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB
Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
vs
Jetson Orin NX 16 GB Jetson Orin NX 16 GB
Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
vs
GeForce MX250 GeForce MX250

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 91 vote

Rate Quadro P6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1718 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.