Arc A770 vs Quadro P6000

#ad 
Buy
P102-100 P102-101 Quadro P6000 Tesla P10 Tesla P40
VS
#ad 
Buy
Arc 7 A770M Arc 7 A780 Arc A580 Arc A750 Arc A770 Arc A780

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P6000 with Arc A770, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P6000
2016
24 GB 384-bit, 250 Watt
34.64
+17.3%

P6000 outperforms Arc A770 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
Arc A770 Arc A770

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking117161
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.1752.81
Power efficiency10.9910.41
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGP102DG2-512
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 October 2016 (8 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 $329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Arc A770 has 1166% better value for money than Quadro P6000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38404096
Core clock speed1506 MHz2100 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate394.8614.4
Floating-point processing power12.63 TFLOPS19.66 TFLOPS
ROPs96128
TMUs240256
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type384 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1127 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 432 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Sync IIno data
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.1-
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P6000 34.64
+17.3%
Arc A770 29.54

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P6000 15477
+17.3%
Arc A770 13198

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120−130
+10.1%
109
−10.1%
1440p75−80
+17.2%
64
−17.2%
4K45−50
+15.4%
39
−15.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p49.99
−1556%
3.02
+1556%
1440p79.99
−1456%
5.14
+1456%
4K133.31
−1480%
8.44
+1480%
  • Arc A770 has 1556% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • Arc A770 has 1456% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • Arc A770 has 1480% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 179
+0%
179
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 317
+0%
317
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+0%
78
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 132
+0%
132
+0%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 270
+0%
270
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70
+0%
70
+0%
Far Cry 5 117
+0%
117
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 33
+0%
33
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 139
+0%
139
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 99
+0%
99
+0%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 143
+0%
143
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
+0%
61
+0%
Far Cry 5 109
+0%
109
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 31
+0%
31
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 127
+0%
127
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 105
+0%
105
+0%
Metro Exodus 113
+0%
113
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 196
+0%
196
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 58
+0%
58
+0%
Far Cry 5 104
+0%
104
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 23
+0%
23
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+0%
72
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+0%
45
+0%
Metro Exodus 71
+0%
71
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+0%
45
+0%
Far Cry 5 82
+0%
82
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 15
+0%
15
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+0%
60
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 48
+0%
48
+0%
Metro Exodus 47
+0%
47
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73
+0%
73
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
+0%
26
+0%
Far Cry 5 49
+0%
49
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8
+0%
8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how Quadro P6000 and Arc A770 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P6000 is 10% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P6000 is 17% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P6000 is 15% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 34.64 29.54
Recency 1 October 2016 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 225 Watt

Quadro P6000 has a 17.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Arc A770, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 11.1% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A770 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation graphics card while Arc A770 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Quadro P6000
Intel Arc A770
Arc A770
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Pro W6600 Radeon Pro W6600
Arc A770 Arc A770
vs
RX Vega 56 Radeon RX Vega 56
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Pro W6800X Duo Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
UHD Graphics Intel UHD Graphics
vs
FX 5200 FX 5200
Tesla K10 NVIDIA Tesla K10
vs
GTX 1080 11Gbps GTX 1080 11Gbps
GeForce 820M NVIDIA GeForce 820M
vs
Quadro M500M Quadro M500M
T400 4 GB NVIDIA T400 4 GB
vs
GTX 460 GTX 460
GT 610 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 OEM
vs
GT 430 GT 430
ATI 9550 ATI Radeon 9550
vs
ATI X1600 PRO X1600 PRO
Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
vs
RTX 3080 Ti RTX 3080 Ti
Arc 7 A770M Intel Arc 7 A770M
vs
RTX A2000 12 GB A2000 12 GB
Playstation 3 GPU 90nm NVIDIA Playstation 3 GPU 90nm
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB GTX 1060 6 GB
R5 240 OEM AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
vs
Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 96 votes

Rate Quadro P6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 5396 votes

Rate Arc A770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P6000 or Arc A770, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.