Radeon RX 5300 OEM vs Quadro P600

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking496not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.94no data
Power efficiency14.93no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGP107Navi 14
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 February 2017 (7 years ago)28 May 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$178 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384768
Core clock speed1430 MHz1375 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHz1645 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt135 Watt
Texture fill rate38.8878.96
Floating-point processing power1.244 TFLOPS2.527 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs2448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB3 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1252 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.13 GB/s84 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 February 2017 28 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 135 Watt

Quadro P600 has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 237.5% lower power consumption.

RX 5300 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P600 and Radeon RX 5300 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P600 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 5300 OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P600
Quadro P600
AMD Radeon RX 5300 OEM
Radeon RX 5300 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 211 votes

Rate Quadro P600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 4 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5300 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.