Radeon R7 350X OEM vs Quadro P600

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking499not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.91no data
Power efficiency14.79no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameGP107Oland
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 February 2017 (7 years ago)5 May 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$178 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384384
Core clock speed1430 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHz1050 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate38.8825.20
Floating-point processing power1.244 TFLOPS0.8064 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs2424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1252 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.13 GB/s32 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.75.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 February 2017 5 May 2015
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 65 Watt

Quadro P600 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 62.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P600 and Radeon R7 350X OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P600 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 350X OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P600
Quadro P600
AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
Radeon R7 350X OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 212 votes

Rate Quadro P600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 164 votes

Rate Radeon R7 350X OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.