Radeon Pro 455 vs Quadro P600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P600 with Radeon Pro 455, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P600
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
8.57
+6.3%

P600 outperforms Pro 455 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking492510
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.30no data
Power efficiency15.3016.45
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGP107Baffin
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date7 February 2017 (7 years ago)30 October 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$178 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384768
Core clock speed1430 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate38.8841.04
Floating-point processing power1.244 TFLOPS1.313 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs2448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1252 MHz1270 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.13 GB/s81.28 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P600 8.57
+6.3%
Pro 455 8.06

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P600 3306
+6.2%
Pro 455 3112

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro P600 4655
Pro 455 5388
+15.7%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P600 4083
+8.6%
Pro 455 3759

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P600 28957
+23.6%
Pro 455 23434

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P600 243785
+6.4%
Pro 455 229045

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Quadro P600 1162
+3.9%
Pro 455 1118

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD37
+8.8%
34
−8.8%
4K21−24
+0%
21
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+5%
20−22
−5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+4.3%
21−24
−4.3%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+5.6%
50−55
−5.6%
Hitman 3 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+4.3%
45−50
−4.3%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+9.1%
21−24
−9.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+5%
20−22
−5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+4.3%
21−24
−4.3%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+5.6%
50−55
−5.6%
Hitman 3 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+4.3%
45−50
−4.3%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+9.1%
21−24
−9.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+4.3%
21−24
−4.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+5%
20−22
−5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+5.6%
50−55
−5.6%
Hitman 3 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+4.3%
45−50
−4.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+0%
14
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+9.1%
21−24
−9.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+9.4%
30−35
−9.4%
Hitman 3 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+5.9%
50−55
−5.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hitman 3 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+13.8%
27−30
−13.8%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how Quadro P600 and Pro 455 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P600 is 9% faster in 1080p
  • A tie in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P600 is 33% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P600 is ahead in 50 tests (69%)
  • there's a draw in 22 tests (31%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.57 8.06
Recency 7 February 2017 30 October 2016
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 35 Watt

Quadro P600 has a 6.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro 455, on the other hand, has 14.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro P600 and Radeon Pro 455.

Be aware that Quadro P600 is a workstation card while Radeon Pro 455 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P600
Quadro P600
AMD Radeon Pro 455
Radeon Pro 455

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 196 votes

Rate Quadro P600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 17 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 455 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.