Radeon HD 8310G vs Quadro P600

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking492not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.25no data
Power efficiency14.88no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameGP107Scrapper Lite
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 February 2017 (7 years ago)July 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$178 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384128
Core clock speed1430 MHz554 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHz720 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate38.885.760
Floating-point processing power1.244 TFLOPS0.1843 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1252 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth80.13 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.75.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 20 Watt

Quadro P600 has a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

HD 8310G, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P600 and Radeon HD 8310G. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P600 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 8310G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P600
Quadro P600
AMD Radeon HD 8310G
Radeon HD 8310G

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 196 votes

Rate Quadro P600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 8310G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.