Quadro T400 Mobile vs Quadro P600

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking499not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.88no data
Power efficiency14.75no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP107TU117
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date7 February 2017 (7 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$178 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384896
Core clock speed1430 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1620 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate38.8879.80
Floating-point processing power1.244 TFLOPS2.554 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs2456

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1252 MHz10 GB/s
Memory bandwidth80.13 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA6.17.5

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 18 Watt

Quadro P600 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T400 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 122.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P600 and Quadro T400 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P600 is a workstation card while Quadro T400 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P600
Quadro P600
NVIDIA Quadro T400 Mobile
Quadro T400 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 212 votes

Rate Quadro P600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 9 votes

Rate Quadro T400 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.