NVS 5100M vs Quadro P600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P600 with NVS 5100M, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P600
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
7.43
+1551%

P600 outperforms NVS 5100M by a whopping 1551% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5161249
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.40no data
Power efficiency14.731.02
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGP107GT216
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date7 February 2017 (8 years ago)7 January 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$178 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38448
Core clock speed1430 MHz550 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million486 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate38.888.800
Floating-point processing power1.244 TFLOPS0.1162 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs2416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1252 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.13 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.74.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA6.11.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P600 7.43
+1551%
NVS 5100M 0.45

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P600 3318
+1567%
NVS 5100M 199

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
+1700%
2−3
−1700%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.94no data

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+1950%
2−3
−1950%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 0−1
Battlefield 5 35−40
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+1950%
2−3
−1950%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Fortnite 45−50
+2350%
2−3
−2350%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+1700%
2−3
−1700%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
Valorant 80−85
+1950%
4−5
−1950%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+1950%
2−3
−1950%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+1700%
7−8
−1700%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1
Dota 2 81
+1925%
4−5
−1925%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Fortnite 45−50
+2350%
2−3
−2350%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+1700%
2−3
−1700%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 0−1
Metro Exodus 16−18 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Valorant 80−85
+1950%
4−5
−1950%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1
Dota 2 72
+1700%
4−5
−1700%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+1700%
2−3
−1700%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14 0−1
Valorant 80−85
+1950%
4−5
−1950%
Fortnite 45−50
+2350%
2−3
−2350%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
+1967%
3−4
−1967%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12 0−1
Metro Exodus 8−9 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Valorant 90−95
+1720%
5−6
−1720%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 0−1
Far Cry 5 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 0−1
Fortnite 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 0−1
Valorant 40−45
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Battlefield 5 8−9 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
Far Cry 5 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 0−1
Fortnite 8−9 0−1

This is how Quadro P600 and NVS 5100M compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P600 is 1700% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.43 0.45
Recency 7 February 2017 7 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 35 Watt

Quadro P600 has a 1551.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 5100M, on the other hand, has 14.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P600 is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 5100M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P600 is a workstation card while NVS 5100M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P600
Quadro P600
NVIDIA NVS 5100M
NVS 5100M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5
219 votes

Rate Quadro P600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4
36 votes

Rate NVS 5100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P600 or NVS 5100M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.