RTX A1000 Mobile vs Quadro P5200

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5200 and RTX A1000 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro P5200
2018
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
31.49
+27.4%

P5200 outperforms RTX A1000 Mobile by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking176222
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.5928.24
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP104GA107
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602048
Core clock speed1556 MHz630 MHz
Boost clock speed1746 MHz1140 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate279.472.96
Floating-point processing power8.94 TFLOPS4.669 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16064
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth230.4 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.18.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P5200 31.49
+27.4%
RTX A1000 Mobile 24.72

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P5200 12135
+27.4%
RTX A1000 Mobile 9527

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro P5200 25100
+65.8%
RTX A1000 Mobile 15135

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro P5200 65844
+12.9%
RTX A1000 Mobile 58312

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P5200 18467
+63.1%
RTX A1000 Mobile 11321

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P5200 106328
+50%
RTX A1000 Mobile 70880

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Quadro P5200 6422
+50.9%
RTX A1000 Mobile 4256

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD112
+62.3%
69
−62.3%
1440p30−35
+11.1%
27
−11.1%
4K38
+40.7%
27−30
−40.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−13%
61
+13%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+35.3%
50−55
−35.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+10%
50
−10%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+38.7%
75−80
−38.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+38.3%
45−50
−38.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+8%
50
−8%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+34%
50−55
−34%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+32.8%
60−65
−32.8%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+24.8%
130−140
−24.8%
Hitman 3 65−70
+45.7%
45−50
−45.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+28.7%
100−110
−28.7%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+35.4%
75−80
−35.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+29.5%
60−65
−29.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 152
+97.4%
75−80
−97.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+18.2%
95−100
−18.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+35.3%
50−55
−35.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+66.7%
33
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+38.7%
75−80
−38.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+38.3%
45−50
−38.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+45.9%
37
−45.9%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+34%
50−55
−34%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+32.8%
60−65
−32.8%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+24.8%
130−140
−24.8%
Hitman 3 65−70
+45.7%
45−50
−45.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+28.7%
100−110
−28.7%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+35.4%
75−80
−35.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+29.5%
60−65
−29.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+28.7%
87
−28.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+34%
50−55
−34%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+18.2%
95−100
−18.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+35.3%
50−55
−35.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+120%
25
−120%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+38.3%
45−50
−38.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+86.2%
29
−86.2%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+34%
50−55
−34%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+24.8%
130−140
−24.8%
Hitman 3 65−70
+45.7%
45−50
−45.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+28.7%
100−110
−28.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+47.4%
76
−47.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65
+51.2%
43
−51.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+350%
26
−350%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+29.5%
60−65
−29.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+36.4%
40−45
−36.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+40%
35−40
−40%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+50%
22
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+42.3%
24−27
−42.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+39.7%
130−140
−39.7%
Hitman 3 40−45
+48.1%
27−30
−48.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+42.6%
45−50
−42.6%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+41.9%
40−45
−41.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75
+51%
45−50
−51%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+53.6%
27−30
−53.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 160−170
+27.3%
130−140
−27.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+42.1%
35−40
−42.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+34.8%
21−24
−34.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Hitman 3 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+31.9%
110−120
−31.9%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+91.7%
24−27
−91.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+46.2%
12−14
−46.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+41.9%
30−35
−41.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+55.6%
27−30
−55.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+40%
20−22
−40%

This is how Quadro P5200 and RTX A1000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P5200 is 62% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P5200 is 11% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P5200 is 41% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P5200 is 350% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX A1000 Mobile is 13% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P5200 is ahead in 71 test (99%)
  • RTX A1000 Mobile is ahead in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.49 24.72
Recency 21 February 2018 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 60 Watt

Quadro P5200 has a 27.4% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX A1000 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P5200 is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A1000 Mobile in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P5200
Quadro P5200
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile
RTX A1000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 94 votes

Rate Quadro P5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 88 votes

Rate RTX A1000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.