Quadro T2000 Mobile vs Quadro P5200

Place in the ranking	180	269
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	21.62	23.83
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GP104	TU117
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	21 February 2018 (6 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	1024
Core clock speed	1556 MHz	1575 MHz
Boost clock speed	1746 MHz	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	60 Watt
Texture fill rate	279.4	114.2
Floating-point processing power	8.94 TFLOPS	3.656 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	32
TMUs	160	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	230.4 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	6.1	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P5200 31.41
+51.2%

T2000 Mobile 20.77

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P5200 12077
+51.2%

T2000 Mobile 7985

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro P5200 25100
+85.6%

T2000 Mobile 13524

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	114 +52%	75−80 −52%
4K	46 +53.3%	30−35 −53.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	60−65 +67.6%	35−40 −67.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +58.5%	40−45 −58.5%
Elden Ring	100−110 +60.6%	65−70 −60.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 +37.9%	65−70 −37.9%
Counter-Strike 2	60−65 +67.6%	35−40 −67.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +58.5%	40−45 −58.5%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +63.6%	85−90 −63.6%
Metro Exodus	75−80 +41.1%	55−60 −41.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 +38.3%	45−50 −38.3%
Valorant	120−130 +48.8%	80−85 −48.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 +37.9%	65−70 −37.9%
Counter-Strike 2	60−65 +67.6%	35−40 −67.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +58.5%	40−45 −58.5%
Dota 2	100−110 +42.5%	70−75 −42.5%
Elden Ring	100−110 +60.6%	65−70 −60.6%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +27.9%	65−70 −27.9%
Fortnite	140−150 +34.9%	100−110 −34.9%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +63.6%	85−90 −63.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	100−110 +41.1%	70−75 −41.1%
Metro Exodus	75−80 +41.1%	55−60 −41.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	216 +56.5%	130−140 −56.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 +38.3%	45−50 −38.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−110 +60.6%	65−70 −60.6%
Valorant	120−130 +48.8%	80−85 −48.8%
World of Tanks	270−280 +16.9%	230−240 −16.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 +37.9%	65−70 −37.9%
Counter-Strike 2	60−65 +67.6%	35−40 −67.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +58.5%	40−45 −58.5%
Dota 2	100−110 +42.5%	70−75 −42.5%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +27.9%	65−70 −27.9%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +63.6%	85−90 −63.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	84 −64.3%	130−140 +64.3%
Valorant	120−130 +48.8%	80−85 −48.8%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	55−60 +69.7%	30−35 −69.7%
Elden Ring	55−60 +68.6%	35−40 −68.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	55−60 +64.7%	30−35 −64.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +1.7%	170−180 −1.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 +57.9%	18−20 −57.9%
World of Tanks	200−210 +44.3%	140−150 −44.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +45.2%	40−45 −45.2%
Counter-Strike 2	27−30 +70.6%	16−18 −70.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +70.6%	16−18 −70.6%
Far Cry 5	95−100 +71.9%	55−60 −71.9%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 +61.1%	50−55 −61.1%
Metro Exodus	70−75 +48.9%	45−50 −48.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +72.4%	27−30 −72.4%
Valorant	90−95 +68.5%	50−55 −68.5%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−33 +76.5%	16−18 −76.5%
Dota 2	55−60 +65.7%	35−40 −65.7%
Elden Ring	27−30 +80%	14−16 −80%
Grand Theft Auto V	55−60 +65.7%	35−40 −65.7%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +66.7%	14−16 −66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	93 +50%	60−65 −50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 +53.8%	12−14 −53.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +65.7%	35−40 −65.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +66.7%	21−24 −66.7%
Counter-Strike 2	30−33 +76.5%	16−18 −76.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
Dota 2	55−60 +65.7%	35−40 −65.7%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +63%	27−30 −63%
Fortnite	40−45 +64%	24−27 −64%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +61.3%	30−35 −61.3%
Valorant	45−50 +84%	24−27 −84%

This is how Quadro P5200 and T2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

Quadro P5200 is 52% faster in 1080p
Quadro P5200 is 53% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P5200 is 100% faster.
in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 64% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Quadro P5200 is ahead in 62 tests (98%)
T2000 Mobile is ahead in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	31.41	20.77
Recency	21 February 2018	27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	60 Watt