GeForce GTX TITAN X vs Quadro P5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5200 with GeForce GTX TITAN X, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P5200
2018
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
26.76

GTX TITAN X outperforms P5200 by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking192175
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.93
Power efficiency21.249.12
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGP104GM200
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 February 2018 (7 years ago)17 March 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25603072
Core clock speed1556 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1746 MHz1075 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate279.4209.1
Floating-point processing power8.94 TFLOPS6.691 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs160192

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)no data600 Watt
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options-4x

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz7.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth230.4 GB/s336.5 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Multi monitor supportno data4 displays
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream-+
GeForce ShadowPlay-+
GPU Boostno data2.0
GameWorks-+
Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA6.15.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P5200 26.76
GTX TITAN X 28.60
+6.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P5200 11957
GTX TITAN X 12781
+6.9%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro P5200 38994
GTX TITAN X 41155
+5.5%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Quadro P5200 45615
GTX TITAN X 53345
+16.9%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Quadro P5200 45689
+36.3%
GTX TITAN X 33524

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120
+0%
120−130
+0%
4K48
−4.2%
50−55
+4.2%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data8.33
4Kno data19.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 160−170
−1.8%
170−180
+1.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 60−65
−3.2%
65−70
+3.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
−0.9%
110−120
+0.9%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
−1.8%
170−180
+1.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 95−100
−5.3%
100−105
+5.3%
Fortnite 130−140
−3.7%
140−150
+3.7%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−5.3%
120−130
+5.3%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
−3.3%
95−100
+3.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 60−65
−3.2%
65−70
+3.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−4.3%
120−130
+4.3%
Valorant 180−190
−2.2%
190−200
+2.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
−0.9%
110−120
+0.9%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
−1.8%
170−180
+1.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−6.6%
290−300
+6.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Dota 2 130−140
−6.1%
140−150
+6.1%
Far Cry 5 95−100
−5.3%
100−105
+5.3%
Fortnite 130−140
−3.7%
140−150
+3.7%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−5.3%
120−130
+5.3%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
−3.3%
95−100
+3.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−110
−6.8%
110−120
+6.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 60−65
−3.2%
65−70
+3.2%
Metro Exodus 65−70
−6.1%
70−75
+6.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−4.3%
120−130
+4.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118
−1.7%
120−130
+1.7%
Valorant 180−190
−2.2%
190−200
+2.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
−0.9%
110−120
+0.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Dota 2 130−140
−6.1%
140−150
+6.1%
Far Cry 5 95−100
−5.3%
100−105
+5.3%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−5.3%
120−130
+5.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 60−65
−3.2%
65−70
+3.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−4.3%
120−130
+4.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 180−190
−2.2%
190−200
+2.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 130−140
−3.7%
140−150
+3.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
−2.9%
70−75
+2.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
−4%
210−220
+4%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−2.9%
180−190
+2.9%
Valorant 220−230
−2.7%
230−240
+2.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−1.3%
80−85
+1.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−2.9%
70−75
+2.9%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−2.6%
80−85
+2.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
−6.1%
35−40
+6.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75
−4.2%
75−80
+4.2%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
−5.3%
60−65
+5.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%
Valorant 170−180
−3.4%
180−190
+3.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Dota 2 90−95
−4.4%
95−100
+4.4%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−5.8%
55−60
+5.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−6.1%
35−40
+6.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%

This is how Quadro P5200 and GTX TITAN X compete in popular games:

  • A tie in 1080p
  • GTX TITAN X is 4% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.76 28.60
Recency 21 February 2018 17 March 2015
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 250 Watt

Quadro P5200 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

GTX TITAN X, on the other hand, has a 6.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro P5200 and GeForce GTX TITAN X.

Be aware that Quadro P5200 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX TITAN X is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P5200
Quadro P5200
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
GeForce GTX TITAN X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 101 vote

Rate Quadro P5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 243 votes

Rate GeForce GTX TITAN X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P5200 or GeForce GTX TITAN X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.