GeForce MX570 vs Quadro P520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P520 with GeForce MX570, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P520
2019
2 GB GDDR5, 18 Watt
5.43

MX570 outperforms P520 by a whopping 174% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking612355
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.6840.80
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP108GA107
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date23 May 2019 (5 years ago)May 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842048
Core clock speed1303 MHz832 MHz
Boost clock speed1493 MHz1155 MHz
Number of transistors1,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate35.8373.92
Floating-point processing power1.147 TFLOPS4.731 TFLOPS
ROPs1640
TMUs2464
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth48.06 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.18.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P520 5.43
GeForce MX570 14.88
+174%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P520 2092
GeForce MX570 5735
+174%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21
−162%
55−60
+162%
4K23
−161%
60−65
+161%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−156%
21−24
+156%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−143%
30−35
+143%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−243%
45−50
+243%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−156%
21−24
+156%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−173%
40−45
+173%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−174%
95−100
+174%
Hitman 3 10−12
−155%
27−30
+155%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−124%
75−80
+124%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−173%
40−45
+173%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−153%
45−50
+153%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−62.5%
75−80
+62.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−143%
30−35
+143%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−243%
45−50
+243%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−156%
21−24
+156%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−173%
40−45
+173%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−174%
95−100
+174%
Hitman 3 10−12
−155%
27−30
+155%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−124%
75−80
+124%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−173%
40−45
+173%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−153%
45−50
+153%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−94.4%
35−40
+94.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−62.5%
75−80
+62.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−143%
30−35
+143%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−156%
21−24
+156%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−174%
95−100
+174%
Hitman 3 10−12
−155%
27−30
+155%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−124%
75−80
+124%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−153%
45−50
+153%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
−218%
35−40
+218%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−62.5%
75−80
+62.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−173%
40−45
+173%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−190%
27−30
+190%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−188%
21−24
+188%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−200%
14−16
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 12−14
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−183%
16−18
+183%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−450%
75−80
+450%
Hitman 3 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−767%
24−27
+767%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−168%
90−95
+168%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−175%
10−12
+175%
Hitman 3 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−640%
70−75
+640%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 2−3
Far Cry 5 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−300%
20−22
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−117%
12−14
+117%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how Quadro P520 and GeForce MX570 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX570 is 162% faster in 1080p
  • GeForce MX570 is 161% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 1300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce MX570 is ahead in 68 tests (97%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.43 14.88
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 25 Watt

Quadro P520 has 38.9% lower power consumption.

GeForce MX570, on the other hand, has a 174% higher aggregate performance score, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce MX570 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P520 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P520 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce MX570 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P520
Quadro P520
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 104 votes

Rate Quadro P520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 93 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.