Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) vs Quadro P5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P104-100 P106-090 P106-100 P400 P2000 P2200 P4000 P5000 Tesla P4 Tesla P40 Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
(Beema/Carrizo-L) (Bristol Ridge) (Carrizo) (Kaveri) (Stoney Ridge) A230 A330 A335 M230 M230 Rebrand M240 M240 Rebrand M255 M315 M320 M330 M335 M420 M430 M435 Mobile Graphics

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5000 with Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), including specs and performance data.

Quadro P5000
2016, $2,499
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
30.30
+2178%

P5000 outperforms R5 (Stoney Ridge) by a whopping 2178% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
R5 (Stoney Ridge) R5 (Stoney Ridge)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2081060
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.75no data
Power efficiency12.942.27
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameGP104Stoney Ridge
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 October 2016 (9 years ago)1 June 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048192
Core clock speed1607 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1733 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt12-45 Watt
Texture fill rate277.3no data
Floating-point processing power8.873 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs160no data
L1 Cache960 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount16 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1127 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth192 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortno data
Display Port1.4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (FL 12_0)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD93
+1063%
8
−1063%
4K41
+4000%
1−2
−4000%

Cost per frame, $

1080p26.87no data
4K60.95no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+2371%
7−8
−2371%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+2200%
3−4
−2200%
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70
+1017%
6−7
−1017%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 110−120
+5600%
2−3
−5600%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+2371%
7−8
−2371%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+2200%
3−4
−2200%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+9800%
1
−9800%
Fortnite 140−150
+1914%
7
−1914%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+2300%
5
−2300%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+4750%
2−3
−4750%
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70
+1017%
6−7
−1017%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+1130%
10−11
−1130%
Valorant 190−200
+471%
30−35
−471%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 110−120
+5600%
2−3
−5600%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+2371%
7−8
−2371%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+820%
30−33
−820%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+2200%
3−4
−2200%
Dota 2 130−140
+694%
16−18
−694%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+3200%
3−4
−3200%
Fortnite 140−150
+3425%
4−5
−3425%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+1400%
8−9
−1400%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+4750%
2−3
−4750%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−110 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70
+1017%
6−7
−1017%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+7000%
1
−7000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+1130%
10−11
−1130%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98
+1300%
7−8
−1300%
Valorant 190−200
+471%
30−35
−471%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120
+5600%
2−3
−5600%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+2200%
3−4
−2200%
Dota 2 130−140
+694%
16−18
−694%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+3200%
3−4
−3200%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+1400%
8−9
−1400%
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70
+1017%
6−7
−1017%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+1130%
10−11
−1130%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53
+657%
7−8
−657%
Valorant 190−200
+471%
30−35
−471%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 140−150
+3425%
4−5
−3425%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+1675%
4−5
−1675%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+2300%
9−10
−2300%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+2950%
2−3
−2950%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+1150%
14−16
−1150%
Valorant 230−240
+5650%
4−5
−5650%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85
+2667%
3−4
−2667%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+7100%
1−2
−7100%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+2667%
3−4
−2667%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+1667%
3−4
−1667%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+3800%
2−3
−3800%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+343%
14−16
−343%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22 0−1
Metro Exodus 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
+3500%
1−2
−3500%
Valorant 180−190
+2557%
7−8
−2557%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+2300%
2−3
−2300%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 0−1
Dota 2 95−100
+9400%
1−2
−9400%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+3700%
1−2
−3700%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+2650%
2−3
−2650%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+1700%
2−3
−1700%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+1750%
2−3
−1750%

This is how Quadro P5000 and R5 (Stoney Ridge) compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P5000 is 1063% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P5000 is 4000% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Quadro P5000 is 9800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Quadro P5000 surpassed R5 (Stoney Ridge) in all 49 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 30.30 1.33
Recency 1 October 2016 1 June 2016
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 12 Watt

Quadro P5000 has a 2178.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

R5 (Stoney Ridge), on the other hand, has 733.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P5000
Quadro P5000
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
vs
Vega Frontier Edition Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
R5 (Stoney Ridge) Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
vs
GT 550M GeForce GT 550M
Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
vs
Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 8200
HD 6250 AMD Radeon HD 6250
vs
RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary
HD 6250 AMD Radeon HD 6250
vs
RTX 8000 Passive RTX 8000 Passive
HD 6250 AMD Radeon HD 6250
vs
RX 5600 OEM RX 5600 OEM
HD 6250 AMD Radeon HD 6250
vs
Graphics 448SP Graphics 448SP
Quadro P5000 NVIDIA Quadro P5000
vs
GT 650M GT 650M
Quadro P5000 NVIDIA Quadro P5000
vs
HD 6250 HD 6250
Quadro P5000 NVIDIA Quadro P5000
vs
Pro 450 Pro 450
Quadro P5000 NVIDIA Quadro P5000
vs
R5 230 OEM R5 230 OEM
Quadro P5000 NVIDIA Quadro P5000
vs
R9 270 R9 270
Quadro P5000 NVIDIA Quadro P5000
vs
HD 8450 OEM HD 8450 OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 201 votes

Rate Quadro P5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 83 votes

Rate Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P5000 or Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.