Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Quadro P4200

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P4200 with Iris Xe MAX Graphics, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P4200
2018
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
25.13
+392%

P4200 outperforms Iris Xe MAX Graphics by a whopping 392% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking209617
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.4014.16
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameGP104DG1
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)31 October 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304768
Core clock speed1227 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1647 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate237.279.20
Floating-point processing power7.589 TFLOPS2.534 TFLOPS
ROPs6424
TMUs14448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s68.26 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P4200 25.13
+392%
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 5.11

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P4200 10439
+430%
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 1971

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140
+381%
27
−381%
1440p80−85
+371%
17
−371%
4K75−80
+369%
16
−369%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+128%
18−20
−128%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+104%
27−30
−104%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+126%
19
−126%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+128%
35−40
−128%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+122%
21−24
−122%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+128%
18−20
−128%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+115%
27−30
−115%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+106%
30−35
−106%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+92.1%
75−80
−92.1%
Hitman 3 50−55
+113%
24
−113%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+90.2%
60−65
−90.2%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+50.9%
57
−50.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+97%
33
−97%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+130%
35−40
−130%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+51.5%
65−70
−51.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+104%
27−30
−104%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+617%
6
−617%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+128%
35−40
−128%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+122%
21−24
−122%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+128%
18−20
−128%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+115%
27−30
−115%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+106%
30−35
−106%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+92.1%
75−80
−92.1%
Hitman 3 50−55
+122%
23
−122%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+90.2%
60−65
−90.2%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+100%
43
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+103%
30−35
−103%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+158%
33
−158%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+86.2%
27−30
−86.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+51.5%
65−70
−51.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+104%
27−30
−104%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+139%
18−20
−139%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+122%
21−24
−122%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+128%
18−20
−128%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+115%
27−30
−115%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+92.1%
75−80
−92.1%
Hitman 3 50−55
+143%
21
−143%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+346%
26
−346%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+193%
29
−193%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+200%
18
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+51.5%
65−70
−51.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+160%
25
−160%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+118%
21−24
−118%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+124%
16−18
−124%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+136%
10−12
−136%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+213%
8−9
−213%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+142%
12−14
−142%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+123%
12−14
−123%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+167%
50−55
−167%
Hitman 3 30−33
+114%
14−16
−114%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+126%
21−24
−126%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+167%
18−20
−167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+175%
20
−175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+182%
10−12
−182%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+97.2%
70−75
−97.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+121%
18−20
−121%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+127%
10−12
−127%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Hitman 3 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+148%
50−55
−148%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+190%
10−11
−190%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+145%
11
−145%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+127%
14−16
−127%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+182%
11
−182%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+100%
10−12
−100%

This is how Quadro P4200 and Iris Xe MAX Graphics compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is 381% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P4200 is 371% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P4200 is 369% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 617% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Quadro P4200 surpassed Iris Xe MAX Graphics in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.13 5.11
Recency 21 February 2018 31 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 25 Watt

Quadro P4200 has a 391.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe MAX Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation card while Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 57 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 252 votes

Rate Iris Xe MAX Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.