Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Quadro P4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P4200 with Iris Xe Graphics G7, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P4200
2018
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
25.23
+138%

P4200 outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 by a whopping 138% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking216435
Place by popularitynot in top-10018
Power efficiency17.37no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameGP104Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230496
Core clock speed1227 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1647 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate237.2no data
Floating-point processing power7.589 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs144no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR4
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1502 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+161%
18−20
−161%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+143%
21−24
−143%
Elden Ring 80−85
+177%
30−33
−177%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+120%
35−40
−120%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+161%
18−20
−161%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+143%
21−24
−143%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+164%
40−45
−164%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+144%
27−30
−144%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+96.4%
27−30
−96.4%
Valorant 100−110
+153%
40−45
−153%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+120%
35−40
−120%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+161%
18−20
−161%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+143%
21−24
−143%
Dota 2 85−90
+129%
35−40
−129%
Elden Ring 80−85
+177%
30−33
−177%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+79.1%
40−45
−79.1%
Fortnite 120−130
+103%
60−65
−103%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+164%
40−45
−164%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+126%
35−40
−126%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+128%
27−30
−128%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+95.1%
80−85
−95.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+96.4%
27−30
−96.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+156%
30−35
−156%
Valorant 100−110
+153%
40−45
−153%
World of Tanks 250−260
+71.5%
150−160
−71.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+120%
35−40
−120%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+161%
18−20
−161%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+143%
21−24
−143%
Dota 2 85−90
+129%
35−40
−129%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+79.1%
40−45
−79.1%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+164%
40−45
−164%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+95.1%
80−85
−95.1%
Valorant 100−110
+153%
40−45
−153%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 40−45
+163%
16−18
−163%
Elden Ring 45−50
+150%
18−20
−150%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+207%
14−16
−207%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+150%
70−75
−150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+156%
9−10
−156%
World of Tanks 160−170
+139%
70−75
−139%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+143%
21−24
−143%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+222%
21−24
−222%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+179%
24−27
−179%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+142%
24−27
−142%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+164%
14−16
−164%
Valorant 65−70
+152%
27−30
−152%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+156%
9−10
−156%
Dota 2 40−45
+144%
18−20
−144%
Elden Ring 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+110%
21−24
−110%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+157%
30−33
−157%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+110%
21−24
−110%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+189%
9−10
−189%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+156%
9−10
−156%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Dota 2 40−45
+110%
21−24
−110%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+154%
12−14
−154%
Fortnite 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+200%
12−14
−200%
Valorant 30−35
+175%
12−14
−175%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High Preset

Valorant 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 222% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is ahead in 34 tests (76%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.23 10.61
Recency 21 February 2018 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 16 nm 10 nm

Quadro P4200 has a 137.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe Graphics G7, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 57 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2626 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.