GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs Quadro P4200 Max-Q

Quadro P3000 Mobile Quadro P3200 Quadro P4200 Quadro P5200
VS
GTX 1660 Mobile GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P4200 Max-Q with GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

P4200 Max-Q
2018
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
30.03
+3.9%

P4200 Max-Q outperforms GTX 1660 Ti Mobile by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

P4200 Max-Q P4200 Max-Q
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking192197
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data100.00
Power efficiency20.6724.87
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP104TU116
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041536
Core clock speed1215 MHz1455 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHz1590 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate213.1152.6
Floating-point processing power6.82 TFLOPS4.884 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs14496

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.4 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA6.17.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90−95
+1.1%
89
−1.1%
1440p55−60
−3.6%
57
+3.6%
4K35−40
−2.9%
36
+2.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.57
1440pno data4.02
4Kno data6.36

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 63
+0%
63
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 86
+0%
86
+0%
Elden Ring 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 89
+0%
89
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 54
+0%
54
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 63
+0%
63
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 147
+0%
147
+0%
Metro Exodus 88
+0%
88
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 99
+0%
99
+0%
Valorant 148
+0%
148
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 112
+0%
112
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 49
+0%
49
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
+0%
50
+0%
Dota 2 111
+0%
111
+0%
Elden Ring 102
+0%
102
+0%
Far Cry 5 75
+0%
75
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 118
+0%
118
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 105
+0%
105
+0%
Metro Exodus 63
+0%
63
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 232
+0%
232
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 41
+0%
41
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Valorant 71
+0%
71
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 78
+0%
78
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+0%
45
+0%
Dota 2 116
+0%
116
+0%
Far Cry 5 119
+0%
119
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 101
+0%
101
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 125
+0%
125
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Elden Ring 54
+0%
54
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 26
+0%
26
+0%
World of Tanks 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55
+0%
55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 60
+0%
60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 81
+0%
81
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Elden Ring 26
+0%
26
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 19
+0%
19
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90
+0%
90
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 17
+0%
17
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27
+0%
27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Dota 2 85
+0%
85
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 37
+0%
37
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 39
+0%
39
+0%

This is how P4200 Max-Q and GTX 1660 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • P4200 Max-Q is 1% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 4% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 3% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 30.03 28.90
Recency 21 February 2018 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 80 Watt

P4200 Max-Q has a 3.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro P4200 Max-Q and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile.

Be aware that Quadro P4200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Max-Q
Quadro P4200 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P4200 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Max-Q
vs
P5000 Mobile Quadro P5000 Mobile
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
vs
RTX 3050 A Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
P4200 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Max-Q
vs
Pro Vega 48 Radeon Pro Vega 48
RTX 4090 Mobile GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
vs
ROG Ally GPU ROG Ally GPU
RTX 4090 Mobile GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
vs
RX 7700 Radeon RX 7700
L40 CNX L40 CNX
vs
P520 Max-Q Quadro P520 Max-Q
RTX 3070 Ti 8 GB GA102 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 8 GB GA102
vs
UHD Graphics 770 Mobile UHD Graphics 770 Mobile
RX 7600M XT Radeon RX 7600M XT
vs
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile
Radeon 760M Radeon 760M
vs
RTX A1000 RTX A1000
ATI X1650 SE Radeon X1650 SE
vs
RTX 3050 6 GB GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
vs
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
T1200 Mobile T1200 Mobile
vs
Quadro P500 Quadro P500
PRO W7900 Radeon PRO W7900
vs
L20 L20

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.5 2 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1599 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.