GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs Quadro P4200 Max-Q

Quadro P1000 Quadro P2000 Mobile Quadro P2000 Max-Q Quadro P3000 Mobile Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Mobile Quadro P4000 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200 Max-Q Quadro P5000 Mobile Quadro P5200
VS
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1060 Mobile GTX 1650 Mobile GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GTX 1660 Mobile GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P4200 Max-Q with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

P4200 Max-Q
2018
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
29.67
+46.8%

P4200 Max-Q outperforms GTX 1650 Ti Mobile by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

P4200 Max-Q P4200 Max-Q
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking189268
Place by popularitynot in top-10069
Power efficiency20.6828.17
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP104TU116
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)23 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041024
Core clock speed1215 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHz1485 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate213.195.04
Floating-point processing power6.82 TFLOPS3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs14464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.4 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.2.140
CUDA6.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P4200 Max-Q 29.67
+46.8%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.21

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P4200 Max-Q 11446
+46.8%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD85−90
+46.6%
58
−46.6%
1440p60−65
+42.9%
42
−42.9%
4K35−40
+29.6%
27
−29.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 59
+0%
59
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 61
+0%
61
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 49
+0%
49
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 53
+0%
53
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+0%
46
+0%
Far Cry 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 84
+0%
84
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Hitman 3 51
+0%
51
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 181
+0%
181
+0%
Metro Exodus 91
+0%
91
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 44
+0%
44
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 201
+0%
201
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 32
+0%
32
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 47
+0%
47
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
+0%
36
+0%
Far Cry 5 58
+0%
58
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 59
+0%
59
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Hitman 3 50
+0%
50
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180
+0%
180
+0%
Metro Exodus 79
+0%
79
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 39
+0%
39
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75
+0%
75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 183
+0%
183
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27
+0%
27
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 15
+0%
15
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 31
+0%
31
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+0%
34
+0%
Far Cry 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Hitman 3 43
+0%
43
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 64
+0%
64
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 63
+0%
63
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+0%
39
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 22
+0%
22
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 41
+0%
41
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 38
+0%
38
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+0%
16
+0%
Far Cry 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Hitman 3 28
+0%
28
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120
+0%
120
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 20
+0%
20
+0%
Hitman 3 16
+0%
16
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 42
+0%
42
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+0%
25
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how P4200 Max-Q and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • P4200 Max-Q is 47% faster in 1080p
  • P4200 Max-Q is 43% faster in 1440p
  • P4200 Max-Q is 30% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 29.67 20.21
Recency 21 February 2018 23 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 50 Watt

P4200 Max-Q has a 46.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P4200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Max-Q
Quadro P4200 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P4200 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Max-Q
vs
P5000 Mobile Quadro P5000 Mobile
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
vs
Radeon 880M Radeon 880M
P4200 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Max-Q
vs
Pro Vega 48 Radeon Pro Vega 48
P520 Max-Q Quadro P520 Max-Q
vs
RTX 4060 Ti AD104 GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104
P520 Max-Q Quadro P520 Max-Q
vs
B200 SXM 192 GB B200 SXM 192 GB
P4200 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Max-Q
vs
GTX 980M GeForce GTX 980M
P4200 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Max-Q
vs
Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000
P4200 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Max-Q
vs
P4000 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Max-Q
P4200 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Max-Q
vs
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU M2 Max 38-Core GPU
P4200 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Max-Q
vs
P5000 X2 Mobile Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile
P4200 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Max-Q
vs
RTX 4060 AD106 GeForce RTX 4060 AD106
P4200 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Max-Q
vs
RTX 4070 AD103 GeForce RTX 4070 AD103
RTX TITAN Ada RTX TITAN Ada
vs
TITAN Ada TITAN Ada

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.5 2 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1635 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.