Radeon Pro SSG vs Quadro P4000 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro P4000 Mobile with Radeon Pro SSG, including specs and performance data.
Pro SSG outperforms P4000 Mobile by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 311 | 235 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.13 | 0.50 |
| Power efficiency | 13.99 | 7.59 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) |
| GPU code name | GP104 | Fiji |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 11 January 2017 (8 years ago) | 26 July 2016 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $819.61 | $9,999 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
P4000 Mobile has 526% better value for money than Pro SSG.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1792 | 4096 |
| Core clock speed | 1227 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1228 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 7,200 million | 8,900 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 260 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 137.4 | 268.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 4.398 TFLOPS | 8.602 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 112 | 256 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1502 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 1.4a, 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 |
| HDMI | - | + |
| Display Port | 1.4 | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | - |
| 3D Stereo | + | no data |
| Mosaic | + | no data |
| nView Display Management | + | no data |
| Optimus | + | no data |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.170 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 18.36 | 25.90 |
| Recency | 11 January 2017 | 26 July 2016 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 260 Watt |
P4000 Mobile has an age advantage of 5 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 160% lower power consumption.
Pro SSG, on the other hand, has a 41.1% higher aggregate performance score.
The Radeon Pro SSG is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P4000 Mobile in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro P4000 Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon Pro SSG is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
