Quadro P2200 vs Quadro P4000 Max-Q

Place in the ranking	252	238
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	15.80	22.34
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	GP104	GP106
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	11 January 2017 (8 years ago)	10 June 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	1280
Core clock speed	1114 MHz	1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1228 MHz	1493 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	137.5	119.4
Floating-point processing power	4.401 TFLOPS	3.822 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	40
TMUs	112	80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	201 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	5 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	1502 MHz	1251 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.3 GB/s	200.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
CUDA	6.1	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

P4000 Max-Q 22.01

Quadro P2200 23.35
+6.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P4000 Max-Q 8815

Quadro P2200 9349
+6.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	104 −5.8%	110−120 +5.8%
4K	35 +0%	35−40 +0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +5%	40−45 −5%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +2.2%	45−50 −2.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 −5.6%	75−80 +5.6%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +5%	40−45 −5%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +2.2%	45−50 −2.2%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 −1%	100−105 +1%
Forza Horizon 5	60−65 +1.7%	60−65 −1.7%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +1.7%	60−65 −1.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +2%	50−55 −2%
Valorant	90−95 −3.3%	95−100 +3.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 −5.6%	75−80 +5.6%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +5%	40−45 −5%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +2.2%	45−50 −2.2%
Dota 2	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −4.2%	75−80 +4.2%
Fortnite	110−120 −2.6%	120−130 +2.6%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 −1%	100−105 +1%
Forza Horizon 5	60−65 +1.7%	60−65 −1.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	75−80 −1.3%	80−85 +1.3%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +1.7%	60−65 −1.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	193 −3.6%	200−210 +3.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +2%	50−55 −2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70−75 −2.7%	75−80 +2.7%
Valorant	90−95 −3.3%	95−100 +3.3%
World of Tanks	240−250 −4.8%	260−270 +4.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 −5.6%	75−80 +5.6%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +5%	40−45 −5%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +2.2%	45−50 −2.2%
Dota 2	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −4.2%	75−80 +4.2%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 −1%	100−105 +1%
Forza Horizon 5	60−65 +1.7%	60−65 −1.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55 +0%	55−60 +0%
Valorant	90−95 −3.3%	95−100 +3.3%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Dota 2	35−40 −5.3%	40−45 +5.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	35−40 −5.3%	40−45 +5.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −3.4%	180−190 +3.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
World of Tanks	150−160 −4.6%	160−170 +4.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +2.2%	45−50 −2.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 +5.7%	35−40 −5.7%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −5.8%	55−60 +5.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −6.1%	35−40 +6.1%
Valorant	60−65 +1.7%	60−65 −1.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Dota 2	35−40 −2.6%	40−45 +2.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	35−40 −2.6%	40−45 +2.6%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −2.6%	40−45 +2.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −4.3%	24−27 +4.3%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Dota 2	35−40 −2.6%	40−45 +2.6%
Far Cry 5	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Fortnite	27−30 +3.7%	27−30 −3.7%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%
Valorant	27−30 −3.4%	30−33 +3.4%

This is how P4000 Max-Q and Quadro P2200 compete in popular games:

Quadro P2200 is 6% faster in 1080p
A tie in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	22.01	23.35
Recency	11 January 2017	10 June 2019
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	5 GB
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	75 Watt

P4000 Max-Q has a 60% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Quadro P2200, on the other hand, has a 6.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro P4000 Max-Q and Quadro P2200.

Be aware that Quadro P4000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while Quadro P2200 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Quadro P4000 Max-Q

Quadro P2200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile

NVIDIA RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q

Max-Q

A10 PCIe

Max-Q

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Vega 64 Limited Edition

5800 XT

Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

5800

Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

GeForce GTX 580

GeForce GTX 1070 SLI

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro P4000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

3.5 380 votes

Rate Quadro P2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P4000 Max-Q or Quadro P2200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.