Quadro K620 vs Quadro P4000 Max-Q

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P4000 Max-Q with Quadro K620, including specs and performance data.

P4000 Max-Q
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
22.88
+295%

P4000 Max-Q outperforms K620 by a whopping 295% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking245596
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.61
Power efficiency15.698.82
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameGP104GM107
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date11 January 2017 (7 years ago)22 July 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$189.89

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792384
Core clock speed1114 MHz1058 MHz
Boost clock speed1228 MHz1124 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt41 Watt
Texture fill rate137.526.98
Floating-point processing power4.401 TFLOPS0.8632 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs11224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data160 mm
Widthno data1" (2.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/sUp to 29 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displaysno data4

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Desktop Managementno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.1.126
CUDA6.15.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P4000 Max-Q 22.88
+295%
Quadro K620 5.79

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P4000 Max-Q 8815
+295%
Quadro K620 2232

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD99
+313%
24−27
−313%
4K37
+311%
9−10
−311%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data7.91
4Kno data21.10

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+311%
9−10
−311%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+317%
12−14
−317%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+333%
9−10
−333%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+317%
18−20
−317%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+360%
10−11
−360%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+311%
9−10
−311%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+342%
12−14
−342%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+329%
14−16
−329%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+357%
30−33
−357%
Hitman 3 45−50
+350%
10−11
−350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+296%
27−30
−296%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+339%
18−20
−339%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+329%
14−16
−329%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
+328%
18−20
−328%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+308%
24−27
−308%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+317%
12−14
−317%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+333%
9−10
−333%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+317%
18−20
−317%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+360%
10−11
−360%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+311%
9−10
−311%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+342%
12−14
−342%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+329%
14−16
−329%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+357%
30−33
−357%
Hitman 3 45−50
+350%
10−11
−350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+296%
27−30
−296%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+339%
18−20
−339%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+329%
14−16
−329%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
+328%
18−20
−328%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+317%
12−14
−317%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+308%
24−27
−308%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+317%
12−14
−317%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+333%
9−10
−333%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+360%
10−11
−360%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+311%
9−10
−311%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+342%
12−14
−342%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+357%
30−33
−357%
Hitman 3 45−50
+350%
10−11
−350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+296%
27−30
−296%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
+328%
18−20
−328%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 42
+320%
10−11
−320%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+308%
24−27
−308%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+329%
14−16
−329%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+330%
10−11
−330%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+300%
6−7
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+333%
6−7
−333%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+333%
6−7
−333%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+333%
30−33
−333%
Hitman 3 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+370%
10−11
−370%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+330%
10−11
−330%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+308%
12−14
−308%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+337%
30−33
−337%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+322%
9−10
−322%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Hitman 3 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+337%
27−30
−337%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+317%
6−7
−317%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+314%
7−8
−314%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+343%
7−8
−343%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%

This is how P4000 Max-Q and Quadro K620 compete in popular games:

  • P4000 Max-Q is 313% faster in 1080p
  • P4000 Max-Q is 311% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.88 5.79
Recency 11 January 2017 22 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 41 Watt

P4000 Max-Q has a 295.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro K620, on the other hand, has 143.9% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P4000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K620 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P4000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while Quadro K620 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
NVIDIA Quadro K620
Quadro K620

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro P4000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 634 votes

Rate Quadro K620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.