GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile vs Quadro P4000 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P4000 Max-Q with GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

P4000 Max-Q
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
22.84

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile outperforms P4000 Max-Q by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking240205
Place by popularitynot in top-10090
Power efficiency15.8824.37
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP104GA106
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date11 January 2017 (7 years ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17922560
Core clock speed1114 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speed1228 MHz1035 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate137.582.80
Floating-point processing power4.401 TFLOPS5.299 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs11280
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.2
CUDA6.18.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P4000 Max-Q 22.84
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 26.28
+15.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P4000 Max-Q 8815
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 10143
+15.1%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

P4000 Max-Q 15837
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 18057
+14%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

P4000 Max-Q 12312
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 13360
+8.5%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

P4000 Max-Q 74933
+2.8%
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 72925

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

P4000 Max-Q 297918
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 422757
+41.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD102
+36%
75
−36%
1440p35−40
−22.9%
43
+22.9%
4K36
+33.3%
27
−33.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−67.6%
62
+67.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−10%
55−60
+10%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−53.8%
60
+53.8%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−9.3%
80−85
+9.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−10.9%
50−55
+10.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−59.5%
59
+59.5%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−9.4%
55−60
+9.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−8.3%
65−70
+8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−6.6%
140−150
+6.6%
Hitman 3 45−50
−77.8%
80
+77.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
−7.5%
110−120
+7.5%
Metro Exodus 75−80
−81%
143
+81%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−63.3%
98
+63.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
−10.4%
85−90
+10.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
−136%
231
+136%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−10%
55−60
+10%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+11.4%
35
−11.4%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−9.3%
80−85
+9.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−10.9%
50−55
+10.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−21.6%
45
+21.6%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−9.4%
55−60
+9.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−8.3%
65−70
+8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−6.6%
140−150
+6.6%
Hitman 3 45−50
−71.1%
77
+71.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
−7.5%
110−120
+7.5%
Metro Exodus 75−80
−44.3%
114
+44.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−30%
78
+30%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
−36.4%
105
+36.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−8%
50−55
+8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
−107%
203
+107%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−10%
55−60
+10%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+50%
26
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−10.9%
50−55
+10.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−8.1%
40
+8.1%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−9.4%
55−60
+9.4%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−6.6%
140−150
+6.6%
Hitman 3 45−50
−48.9%
67
+48.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+16.3%
92
−16.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
−16.9%
90
+16.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 42
−19%
50
+19%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+250%
28
−250%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−35%
81
+35%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−9.3%
45−50
+9.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−8.6%
35−40
+8.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−8.3%
24−27
+8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−18.2%
26
+18.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−7.7%
27−30
+7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−57.1%
22
+57.1%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−11.5%
27−30
+11.5%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−10%
140−150
+10%
Hitman 3 27−30
−70.4%
46
+70.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−46.8%
69
+46.8%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−39.5%
60
+39.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−24.5%
61
+24.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−14.8%
30−35
+14.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
−6.1%
139
+6.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−47.4%
56
+47.4%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−13.6%
24−27
+13.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%
Hitman 3 18−20
−11.1%
20
+11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−8.5%
120−130
+8.5%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−88%
47
+88%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+0%
29
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−100%
10
+100%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−9.7%
30−35
+9.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−25.9%
34
+25.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
+0%
10
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−45%
29
+45%

This is how P4000 Max-Q and RTX 3050 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • P4000 Max-Q is 36% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 23% faster in 1440p
  • P4000 Max-Q is 33% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the P4000 Max-Q is 250% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 136% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • P4000 Max-Q is ahead in 4 tests (6%)
  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is ahead in 66 tests (92%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.84 26.28
Recency 11 January 2017 11 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 75 Watt

P4000 Max-Q has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 15.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P4000 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P4000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro P4000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4123 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.