Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) vs Quadro P3200

Place in the ranking	246	584
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	21.14	28.08
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code name	GP104	Vega Renoir
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	21 February 2018 (6 years ago)	7 January 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	384
Core clock speed	1328 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1543 MHz	1500 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	172.8	no data
Floating-point processing power	5.53 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	64	no data
TMUs	112	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	no data
Memory bus width	192 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1753 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	168.3 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12_1
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-
CUDA	6.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P3200 22.74
+276%

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 6.04

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro P3200 16619
+295%

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 4210

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P3200 12555
+349%

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 2793

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P3200 82507
+277%

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 21857

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P3200 419543
+130%

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 182608

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Quadro P3200 4356
+411%

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 852

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	84 +320%	20 −320%
1440p	80−85 +264%	22 −264%
4K	28 +55.6%	18 −55.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

35−40
+236%

−236%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65 +306%	16 −306%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +388%	8−9 −388%
Battlefield 5	75−80 +341%	16−18 −341%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +236%	14 −236%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +311%	9 −311%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +279%	14−16 −279%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 +233%	18−20 −233%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +234%	40−45 −234%
Hitman 3	45−50 +318%	11 −318%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−110 +10.3%	97 −10.3%
Metro Exodus	75−80 +243%	23 −243%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +173%	22 −173%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	129 +486%	21−24 −486%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 +59.7%	62 −59.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	88 +450%	16−18 −450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +388%	8−9 −388%
Battlefield 5	75−80 +341%	16−18 −341%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +292%	12 −292%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +517%	6 −517%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +279%	14−16 −279%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 +233%	18−20 −233%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +234%	40−45 −234%
Hitman 3	45−50 +254%	12−14 −254%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−110 +46.6%	73 −46.6%
Metro Exodus	75−80 +365%	17 −365%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +329%	14 −329%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75−80 +267%	21 −267%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +150%	20−22 −150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 +98%	50 −98%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40 +150%	16−18 −150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +388%	8−9 −388%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +262%	12−14 −262%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +270%	10−11 −270%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +279%	14−16 −279%
Forza Horizon 4	72 +75.6%	40−45 −75.6%
Hitman 3	45−50 +254%	12−14 −254%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−110 +529%	17 −529%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75−80 +328%	18 −328%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	46 +318%	11 −318%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 +94.1%	50−55 −94.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65
+329%

−329%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +267%	12−14 −267%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +250%	10−11 −250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +300%	6−7 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +2100%	1−2 −2100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +333%	6−7 −333%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +271%	7−8 −271%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +584%	18−20 −584%
Hitman 3	27−30 +170%	10−11 −170%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +236%	14−16 −236%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +617%	6−7 −617%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +2350%	2−3 −2350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +440%	5−6 −440%
Watch Dogs: Legion	130−140 +230%	40−45 −230%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40
+245%

10−12

−245%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +360%	5−6 −360%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Hitman 3	18−20 +800%	2−3 −800%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +973%	11 −973%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +733%	3−4 −733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	28 +833%	3−4 −833%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +250%	4−5 −250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +333%	3−4 −333%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6	0−1
Far Cry 5	12−14 +333%	3−4 −333%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +417%	6−7 −417%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +2600%	1−2 −2600%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

20−22
+186%

7−8

−186%

This is how Quadro P3200 and RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) compete in popular games:

Quadro P3200 is 320% faster in 1080p
Quadro P3200 is 264% faster in 1440p
Quadro P3200 is 56% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P3200 is 2600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, Quadro P3200 surpassed RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in all 71 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	22.74	6.04
Recency	21 February 2018	7 January 2020
Chip lithography	16 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	15 Watt

Quadro P3200 has a 276.5% higher aggregate performance score.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P3200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P3200 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.