Iris Xe Max (DG1 LP / iDG1LP) Mobile vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking226not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.67no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Gen. 12 Xe (2020)
GPU code nameGP104iDG1LPDEV
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)1 March 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores179296
Core clock speed1139 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1404 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate157.2no data
Floating-point processing power5.032 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs112no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB3 GB
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1753 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 February 2018 1 March 2020
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm

P3200 Max-Q has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Iris Xe Max (DG1 LP / iDG1LP) Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P3200 Max-Q and Iris Xe Max (DG1 LP / iDG1LP) Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while Iris Xe Max (DG1 LP / iDG1LP) Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Intel Iris Xe Max (DG1 LP / iDG1LP) Mobile
Iris Xe Max (DG1 LP / iDG1LP) Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 20 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 13 votes

Rate Iris Xe Max (DG1 LP / iDG1LP) Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.