Radeon R9 380X vs Quadro P2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P2000 with Radeon R9 380X, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P2000
2017
5 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
18.84
+17.5%

P2000 outperforms R9 380X by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking290329
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.727.97
Power efficiency17.405.84
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGP106Antigua
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date6 February 2017 (7 years ago)19 November 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$585 $229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P2000 has 22% better value for money than R9 380X.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242048
Compute unitsno data32
Core clock speed1076 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1480 MHz970 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate94.72124.2
Floating-point processing power3.031 TFLOPS3.973 TFLOPS
ROPs4032
TMUs64128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length201 mm221 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsNone​2 x 6-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
High bandwidth memory (HBM)no data-
Maximum RAM amount5 GB4 GB
Memory bus width160 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz970 MHz
Memory bandwidth140.2 GB/s182.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity-+
Number of Eyefinity displaysno data6
HDMI-+
DisplayPort support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire-+
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
LiquidVR-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
ZeroCore-+
VCE-+
DDMA audiono data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan++
Mantle-+
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P2000 18.84
+17.5%
R9 380X 16.03

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P2000 7268
+17.5%
R9 380X 6187

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P2000 6847
R9 380X 9510
+38.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60
+20%
50−55
−20%
1440p21
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
4K15
+25%
12−14
−25%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.754.58
1440p27.8614.31
4K39.0019.08

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+24%
50−55
−24%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Far Cry 5 42
+20%
35−40
−20%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+27.5%
40−45
−27.5%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+18%
100−105
−18%
Hitman 3 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+22.7%
75−80
−22.7%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+18.2%
55−60
−18.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+27.5%
40−45
−27.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 77
+18.5%
65−70
−18.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+25.7%
70−75
−25.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+24%
50−55
−24%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Far Cry 5 33
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+27.5%
40−45
−27.5%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+18%
100−105
−18%
Hitman 3 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+22.7%
75−80
−22.7%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+18.2%
55−60
−18.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+27.5%
40−45
−27.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+24%
50−55
−24%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+25.7%
70−75
−25.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Far Cry 5 26
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+18%
100−105
−18%
Hitman 3 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+22.7%
75−80
−22.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+24%
50−55
−24%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+19%
21−24
−19%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+25.7%
70−75
−25.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+27.5%
40−45
−27.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Far Cry 5 14
+40%
10−11
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+22.4%
85−90
−22.4%
Hitman 3 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+17.9%
95−100
−17.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Hitman 3 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+21.3%
80−85
−21.3%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+30%
10−11
−30%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 7
+40%
5−6
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%

This is how Quadro P2000 and R9 380X compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P2000 is 20% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P2000 is 31% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P2000 is 25% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.84 16.03
Recency 6 February 2017 19 November 2015
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 190 Watt

Quadro P2000 has a 17.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 153.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 380X in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P2000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R9 380X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000
AMD Radeon R9 380X
Radeon R9 380X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 626 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 181 vote

Rate Radeon R9 380X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.