GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition vs Quadro P2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking291not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.62no data
Power efficiency17.51no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGP106G94
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date6 February 2017 (7 years ago)22 December 2008 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$585 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102464
Core clock speed1076 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,400 million505 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate94.7219.20
Floating-point processing power3.031 TFLOPS0.192 TFLOPS
ROPs4016
TMUs6432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length201 mm229 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount5 GB1 GB
Memory bus width160 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz266 MHz
Memory bandwidth140.2 GB/s17.02 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort2x DVI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA6.11.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 February 2017 22 December 2008
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 95 Watt

Quadro P2000 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 306.3% more advanced lithography process, and 26.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P2000 and GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P2000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition
GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 630 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 5 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.