Quadro K2200M vs Quadro P2000 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P2000 Mobile and Quadro K2200M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

P2000 Mobile
2019
3.75 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
15.70
+75%

P2000 Mobile outperforms K2200M by an impressive 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking344486
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.359.46
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameGP106GM107
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date15 February 2019 (5 years ago)19 July 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152640
Core clock speed1291 MHz667 MHz
Boost clock speed1291 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,400 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate92.9526.68
Floating-point processing power2.974 TFLOPS0.8538 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs7240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3.75 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2+
CUDA6.15.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.70 8.97
Recency 15 February 2019 19 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount 3.75 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 65 Watt

P2000 Mobile has a 75% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 87.5% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

K2200M, on the other hand, has 15.4% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2200M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
Quadro P2000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
Quadro K2200M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 110 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 39 votes

Rate Quadro K2200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.