FirePro W6150M vs Quadro P2000 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro P2000 Mobile and FirePro W6150M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
P2000 Mobile outperforms W6150M by a whopping 165% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 331 | 579 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) |
GPU code name | GP107GL | Saturn |
Market segment | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 5 July 2017 (7 years ago) | 12 November 2015 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 1075 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | 3,300 million | 2,080 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | no data |
Texture fill rate | 77.14 | 51.60 |
Floating-point performance | 2.468 gflops | 1.651 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.13 GB/s | 88 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Optimus | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 6.1 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 16.22 | 6.11 |
Recency | 5 July 2017 | 12 November 2015 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
P2000 Mobile has a 165.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The Quadro P2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W6150M in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.