GeForce 7000M vs Quadro P1000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P1000 with GeForce 7000M, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P1000
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
11.63
+38667%

P1000 outperforms 7000M by a whopping 38667% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4221493
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.86no data
Power efficiency20.01no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)no data
GPU code nameGP107C67
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date7 February 2017 (8 years ago)1 February 2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$375 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6403
Core clock speed1493 MHz1 MHz
Boost clock speed1519 MHz350 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Wattno data
Texture fill rate48.61no data
Floating-point processing power1.555 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length145 mmno data
WidthMXM Moduleno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5shared Memory
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1502 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)shared Memory
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P1000 11.63
+38667%
GeForce 7000M 0.03

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P1000 4479
+34354%
GeForce 7000M 13

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD44-0−1
4K11-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p8.52no data
4K34.09no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Battlefield 5 45−50 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Far Cry 5 32 0−1
Fortnite 60−65 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+2250%
2−3
−2250%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+550%
6−7
−550%
Valorant 100−105
+317%
24−27
−317%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Battlefield 5 45−50 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+1678%
9−10
−1678%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Dota 2 75−80
+850%
8−9
−850%
Far Cry 5 29 0−1
Fortnite 60−65 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+2250%
2−3
−2250%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45 0−1
Metro Exodus 21−24 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+550%
6−7
−550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+650%
4−5
−650%
Valorant 100−105
+317%
24−27
−317%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Dota 2 75−80
+850%
8−9
−850%
Far Cry 5 27 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+2250%
2−3
−2250%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+550%
6−7
−550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+300%
4−5
−300%
Valorant 100−105
+317%
24−27
−317%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60−65 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 0−1
Metro Exodus 12−14 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90 0−1
Valorant 120−130 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Far Cry 5 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 18−20 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 9−10 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+46.7%
14−16
−46.7%
Metro Exodus 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 0−1
Valorant 55−60
+5700%
1−2
−5700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 40−45 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 8−9 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P1000 is 5700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Quadro P1000 surpassed GeForce 7000M in all 30 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.63 0.03
Recency 7 February 2017 1 February 2006
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm

Quadro P1000 has a 38666.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P1000 is a workstation card while GeForce 7000M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Quadro P1000
NVIDIA GeForce 7000M
GeForce 7000M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 593 votes

Rate Quadro P1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 23 votes

Rate GeForce 7000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P1000 or GeForce 7000M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.