A800 PCIe 80 GB vs Quadro NVS 290

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1200not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.96no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG86GA100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date4 October 2007 (17 years ago)8 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores166912
Core clock speed459 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistors210 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate3.672609.1
Floating-point processing power0.02938 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs4160
TMUs8432
Tensor Coresno data432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount256 MB80 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1512 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s1,935 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-59No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)N/A
Shader Model4.0N/A
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.18.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 October 2007 8 November 2022
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 80 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 250 Watt

NVS 290 has 1090.5% lower power consumption.

A800 PCIe 80 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, a 31900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1042.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 290 and A800 PCIe 80 GB. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
Quadro NVS 290
NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB
A800 PCIe 80 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 21 vote

Rate Quadro NVS 290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 6 votes

Rate A800 PCIe 80 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.