Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs Quadro NVS 210S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1546not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.35no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameC51Pitcairn
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 December 2003 (22 years ago)13 March 2015 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed425 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data925 MHz
Number of transistors75 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)11 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate0.8559.20
Floating-point processing powerno data1.894 TFLOPS
ROPs132
TMUs264
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data153.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_1)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 December 2003 13 March 2015
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 11 Watt 150 Watt

NVS 210S has 1264% lower power consumption.

R9 270 1024SP, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 221% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 210S and Radeon R9 270 1024SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 210S is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R9 270 1024SP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 12 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 210S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 10 votes

Rate Radeon R9 270 1024SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 210S or Radeon R9 270 1024SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.