T600 vs Quadro M620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M620 with T600, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M620
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
7.22

T600 outperforms M620 by a whopping 132% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking540321
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.7829.22
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM107TU117
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date11 January 2017 (7 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512640
Core clock speed756 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speed977 MHz1335 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate31.2653.40
Floating-point processing power1 TFLOPS1.709 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs3240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA5.07.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M620 7.22
T600 16.76
+132%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M620 2786
T600 6465
+132%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro M620 3801
T600 8694
+129%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro M620 17237
T600 344838
+1901%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro M620 3130
T600 6552
+109%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro M620 22120
T600 40917
+85%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro M620 7961
T600 27837
+250%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Quadro M620 6407
T600 25986
+306%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Quadro M620 8602
T600 26600
+209%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD25
−108%
52
+108%
1440p10−12
−140%
24
+140%
4K10
−110%
21
+110%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−117%
24−27
+117%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−111%
35−40
+111%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−180%
27−30
+180%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−162%
55−60
+162%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−127%
30−35
+127%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−117%
24−27
+117%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−144%
35−40
+144%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−125%
45−50
+125%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−123%
100−110
+123%
Hitman 3 14−16
−129%
30−35
+129%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−93%
80−85
+93%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−171%
55−60
+171%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−130%
45−50
+130%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−129%
55−60
+129%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−53.7%
80−85
+53.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−111%
35−40
+111%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−180%
27−30
+180%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−162%
55−60
+162%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−127%
30−35
+127%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−117%
24−27
+117%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−144%
35−40
+144%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−125%
45−50
+125%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−123%
100−110
+123%
Hitman 3 14−16
−129%
30−35
+129%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−93%
80−85
+93%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−171%
55−60
+171%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−130%
45−50
+130%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−113%
51
+113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+59%
35−40
−59%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−53.7%
80−85
+53.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−111%
35−40
+111%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−180%
27−30
+180%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−127%
30−35
+127%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−117%
24−27
+117%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−144%
35−40
+144%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−123%
100−110
+123%
Hitman 3 14−16
−129%
30−35
+129%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+10.3%
39
−10.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−87.5%
45
+87.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−170%
27
+170%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−53.7%
80−85
+53.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−130%
45−50
+130%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−129%
30−35
+129%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−136%
24−27
+136%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−143%
16−18
+143%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−138%
18−20
+138%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−246%
90−95
+246%
Hitman 3 10−12
−81.8%
20−22
+81.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−80%
27
+80%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−540%
32
+540%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−122%
100−110
+122%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−133%
27−30
+133%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Hitman 3 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−254%
85−90
+254%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−240%
16−18
+240%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−300%
16
+300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−188%
21−24
+188%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−800%
18
+800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%

This is how Quadro M620 and T600 compete in popular games:

  • T600 is 108% faster in 1080p
  • T600 is 140% faster in 1440p
  • T600 is 110% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro M620 is 59% faster.
  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T600 is 800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro M620 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • T600 is ahead in 70 tests (97%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.22 16.76
Recency 11 January 2017 6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 40 Watt

Quadro M620 has 33.3% lower power consumption.

T600, on the other hand, has a 132.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The T600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M620 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M620 is a mobile workstation card while T600 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M620
Quadro M620
NVIDIA T600
T600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 195 votes

Rate Quadro M620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 680 votes

Rate T600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.