UHD Graphics 630 vs Quadro M600M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M600M with UHD Graphics 630, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M600M
2015
2 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
5.58
+80.6%

M600M outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by an impressive 81% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking605761
Place by popularitynot in top-10030
Power efficiency12.7514.12
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGM107Comet Lake GT2
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date18 August 2015 (9 years ago)1 October 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384184
Core clock speed837 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed876 MHz1150 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate14.0226.45
Floating-point processing power0.6728 TFLOPS0.4232 TFLOPS
ROPs83
TMUs1623

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1253 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth80 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan+1.1.103
CUDA5.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M600M 5.58
+80.6%
UHD Graphics 630 3.09

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M600M 2150
+80.4%
UHD Graphics 630 1192

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro M600M 2911
+62.7%
UHD Graphics 630 1790

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro M600M 12734
+65.3%
UHD Graphics 630 7704

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro M600M 2430
+101%
UHD Graphics 630 1211

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro M600M 18491
+88.7%
UHD Graphics 630 9798

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Quadro M600M 631
+52.2%
UHD Graphics 630 415

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
+12.5%
16
−12.5%
1440p18−20
+80%
10
−80%
4K12−14
+71.4%
7
−71.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+80%
5
−80%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+114%
7
−114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Battlefield 5 14−16
+50%
10
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+71.4%
7
−71.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+77.8%
9
−77.8%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+20%
30
−20%
Hitman 3 12−14
+100%
6
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+52.2%
21−24
−52.2%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+7.7%
13
−7.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+66.7%
9
−66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+25%
16
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+63.3%
30
−63.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Battlefield 5 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+33.3%
27
−33.3%
Hitman 3 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+52.2%
21−24
−52.2%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+66.7%
12
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+26.7%
15
−26.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+75%
28
−75%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+112%
16−18
−112%
Hitman 3 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+52.2%
21−24
−52.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+81.8%
11
−81.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
−75%
14−16
+75%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+25.6%
35−40
−25.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Hitman 3 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+89.5%
18−20
−89.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Hitman 3 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

This is how Quadro M600M and UHD Graphics 630 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro M600M is 13% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro M600M is 80% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro M600M is 71% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Quadro M600M is 500% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics 630 is 75% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro M600M is ahead in 61 test (98%)
  • UHD Graphics 630 is ahead in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.58 3.09
Recency 18 August 2015 1 October 2017
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 15 Watt

Quadro M600M has a 80.6% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics 630, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Quadro M600M is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 630 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M600M is a mobile workstation card while UHD Graphics 630 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Quadro M600M
Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 23 votes

Rate Quadro M600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3913 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.