Radeon R4 Graphics vs Quadro M6000
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 178 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.24 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 8.47 | no data |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) | GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) |
| GPU code name | GM200 | Beema |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 21 March 2015 (9 years ago) | 11 June 2014 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4,199.99 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3072 | 128 |
| Core clock speed | 988 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1114 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 8,000 million | 930 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 213.9 | 6.400 |
| Floating-point processing power | 6.844 TFLOPS | 0.2048 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 96 | 4 |
| TMUs | 192 | 8 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 1653 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 317.4 GB/s | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | + | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 21 March 2015 | 11 June 2014 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 15 Watt |
Quadro M6000 has an age advantage of 9 months.
R4 Graphics, on the other hand, has 1566.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Quadro M6000 and Radeon R4 Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro M6000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R4 Graphics is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
