Arc A770M vs Quadro M6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro M2000 Quadro M3000 SE Quadro M4000 Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000 SE Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000 24 GB
VS
Arc A350M Arc A370M Arc A380M Arc A530M Arc A550M Arc A570M Arc A730M Arc A770M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M6000 with Arc A770M, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M6000
2015
12 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
26.35

Arc A770M outperforms M6000 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
Arc A770M Arc A770M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking199194
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.44no data
Power efficiency8.3617.66
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGM200DG2-512
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date21 March 2015 (10 years ago)2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,199.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30724096
Core clock speed988 MHz1650 MHz
Boost clock speed1114 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate213.9524.8
Floating-point processing power6.844 TFLOPS16.79 TFLOPS
ROPs96128
TMUs192256
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1653 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth317.4 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA5.2-
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro M6000 26.35
Arc A770M 26.73
+1.4%
  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M6000 11776
Arc A770M 11943
+1.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD85−90
−4.7%
89
+4.7%
1440p50−55
−8%
54
+8%
4K35−40
−5.7%
37
+5.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p49.41no data
1440p84.00no data
4K120.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 113
+0%
113
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 52
+0%
52
+0%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95
+0%
95
+0%
Far Cry 5 106
+0%
106
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 53
+0%
53
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 77
+0%
77
+0%
Dota 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 99
+0%
99
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
+0%
86
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 55
+0%
55
+0%
Metro Exodus 93
+0%
93
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 173
+0%
173
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 67
+0%
67
+0%
Dota 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 95
+0%
95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 52
+0%
52
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+0%
51
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 79
+0%
79
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 57
+0%
57
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 44
+0%
44
+0%
Far Cry 5 81
+0%
81
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 39
+0%
39
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+0%
45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+0%
62
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+0%
22
+0%
Dota 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry 5 45
+0%
45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 22
+0%
22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how Quadro M6000 and Arc A770M compete in popular games:

  • Arc A770M is 5% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A770M is 8% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A770M is 6% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 26.35 26.73
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 120 Watt

Arc A770M has a 1.4% higher aggregate performance score, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 108.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro M6000 and Arc A770M.

Be aware that Quadro M6000 is a workstation card while Arc A770M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro M6000
Quadro M6000
Intel Arc A770M
Arc A770M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
Pro 5700 Radeon Pro 5700
Arc A770M Arc A770M
vs
RTX 2060 Mobile GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
M6000 24 GB Quadro M6000 24 GB
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
GeForce 830A GeForce 830A
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
GeForce2 Go 100 GeForce2 Go 100
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
ATI VGA Wonder VGA Wonder
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
Vega 8 Embedded Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
Arc 3 A370M Arc 3 A370M
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
RTX 4070 Mobile GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
K2000M Quadro K2000M
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
GTX 775M Mac Edition GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
ATI HD 4350 PCI Radeon HD 4350 PCI
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
ATI All-In-Wonder 9600 PRO All In-Wonder 9600 PRO

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.4
152 votes

Rate Quadro M6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4
93 votes

Rate Arc A770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M6000 or Arc A770M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.