RTX A500 Mobile vs Quadro M4000M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M4000M with RTX A500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

M4000M
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
15.92

RTX A500 Mobile outperforms M4000M by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking338309
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGM204GA107
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date2 October 2015 (8 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1,2802048
Core clock speed975 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1013 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt60 Watt (20 - 60 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate78.0098.37
Floating-point performance2.496 gflops6.296 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed5012 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA5.28.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M4000M 15.92
RTX A500 Mobile 17.50
+9.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

M4000M 6143
RTX A500 Mobile 6752
+9.9%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

M4000M 10259
RTX A500 Mobile 10748
+4.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70
+66.7%
42
−66.7%
1440p21−24
−23.8%
26
+23.8%
4K20
−170%
54
+170%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+4%
24−27
−4%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+5.6%
35−40
−5.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+4.8%
40−45
−4.8%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+3%
100−105
−3%
Hitman 3 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+3.8%
75−80
−3.8%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+3.8%
50−55
−3.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+2.3%
40−45
−2.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+1.3%
80−85
−1.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+4%
24−27
−4%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+5.6%
35−40
−5.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+4.8%
40−45
−4.8%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+3%
100−105
−3%
Hitman 3 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+3.8%
75−80
−3.8%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+3.8%
50−55
−3.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+2.3%
40−45
−2.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−19.2%
62
+19.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+2.7%
35−40
−2.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+1.3%
80−85
−1.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+4%
24−27
−4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+5.6%
35−40
−5.6%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+3%
100−105
−3%
Hitman 3 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+3.8%
75−80
−3.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−3.8%
54
+3.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+31%
29
−31%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+1.3%
80−85
−1.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+2.3%
40−45
−2.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+3.7%
80−85
−3.7%
Hitman 3 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+3.1%
30−35
−3.1%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−30%
39
+30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+3.2%
95−100
−3.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+4%
24−27
−4%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Hitman 3 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+3.8%
75−80
−3.8%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how M4000M and RTX A500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • M4000M is 67% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A500 Mobile is 24% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A500 Mobile is 170% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the M4000M is 31% faster.
  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX A500 Mobile is 30% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • M4000M is ahead in 59 tests (82%)
  • RTX A500 Mobile is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.92 17.50
Recency 2 October 2015 30 March 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 60 Watt

RTX A500 Mobile has a 9.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro M4000M and RTX A500 Mobile.

Be aware that Quadro M4000M is a mobile workstation card while RTX A500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Quadro M4000M
NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile
RTX A500 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 134 votes

Rate Quadro M4000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 74 votes

Rate RTX A500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.