GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs Quadro M4000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M4000M with GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, including specs and performance data.

M4000M
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
15.83

RTX 4080 SUPER outperforms M4000M by a whopping 460% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3365
Place by popularitynot in top-10058
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data38.12
Power efficiency11.4219.99
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGM204AD103
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date18 August 2015 (9 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1,28010240
Core clock speed975 MHz2295 MHz
Boost clock speed1013 MHz2550 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt320 Watt
Texture fill rate78.00816.0
Floating-point processing power2.496 TFLOPS52.22 TFLOPS
ROPs64112
TMUs80320
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data310 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1438 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s736.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA5.28.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M4000M 15.83
RTX 4080 SUPER 88.68
+460%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

M4000M 6110
RTX 4080 SUPER 34219
+460%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

M4000M 10259
RTX 4080 SUPER 87055
+749%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

M4000M 7723
RTX 4080 SUPER 59075
+665%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

M4000M 49204
RTX 4080 SUPER 187847
+282%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

M4000M 56
RTX 4080 SUPER 318
+469%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

M4000M 89
RTX 4080 SUPER 124
+39.4%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

M4000M 110
+347%
RTX 4080 SUPER 25

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

M4000M 80
RTX 4080 SUPER 237
+198%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

M4000M 68
RTX 4080 SUPER 121
+76.9%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

M4000M 45
RTX 4080 SUPER 316
+610%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

M4000M 7
RTX 4080 SUPER 61
+831%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD63
−317%
263
+317%
1440p30−35
−520%
186
+520%
4K20
−490%
118
+490%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−460%
140−150
+460%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−553%
235
+553%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−981%
281
+981%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−369%
240−250
+369%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−275%
120−130
+275%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−460%
140−150
+460%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−211%
110−120
+211%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−357%
200−210
+357%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−156%
260−270
+156%
Hitman 3 30−35
−316%
120−130
+316%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−285%
300−350
+285%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−182%
150−160
+182%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−182%
120−130
+182%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−663%
350−400
+663%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−90.1%
150−160
+90.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−850%
342
+850%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−812%
237
+812%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−369%
240−250
+369%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−275%
120−130
+275%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−460%
140−150
+460%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−211%
110−120
+211%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−357%
200−210
+357%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−156%
260−270
+156%
Hitman 3 30−35
−316%
120−130
+316%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−285%
300−350
+285%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−182%
150−160
+182%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−182%
120−130
+182%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−992%
568
+992%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−434%
200−210
+434%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−90.1%
150−160
+90.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−339%
158
+339%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−704%
209
+704%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−275%
120−130
+275%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−460%
140−150
+460%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−211%
110−120
+211%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−213%
322
+213%
Hitman 3 30−35
−316%
120−130
+316%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−425%
425
+425%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−913%
527
+913%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−592%
263
+592%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−79%
145
+79%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−182%
120−130
+182%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−435%
160−170
+435%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−348%
110−120
+348%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−744%
135
+744%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−1169%
165
+1169%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−382%
80−85
+382%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−342%
80−85
+342%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−219%
270−280
+219%
Hitman 3 18−20
−579%
120−130
+579%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−945%
345
+945%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−490%
171
+490%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−1223%
397
+1223%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−1200%
221
+1200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
−145%
240−250
+145%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−396%
120−130
+396%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−450%
85−90
+450%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−475%
65−70
+475%
Hitman 3 12−14
−592%
80−85
+592%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−4.9%
85
+4.9%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−788%
140−150
+788%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−1260%
204
+1260%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−967%
96
+967%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−1138%
99
+1138%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−550%
50−55
+550%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−1286%
305
+1286%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−1156%
201
+1156%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−1250%
81
+1250%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−693%
110−120
+693%

This is how M4000M and RTX 4080 SUPER compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4080 SUPER is 317% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4080 SUPER is 520% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4080 SUPER is 490% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4080 SUPER is 1286% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 4080 SUPER surpassed M4000M in all 66 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.83 88.68
Recency 18 August 2015 8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 320 Watt

M4000M has 220% lower power consumption.

RTX 4080 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 460.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M4000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M4000M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Quadro M4000M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 144 votes

Rate Quadro M4000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1622 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.