UHD Graphics 770 vs Quadro M4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GRID M6-8Q GRID M60-1Q GRID M60-2Q GRID M60-4A GRID M60-8Q Quadro M3000 SE Quadro M4000 Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000 SE Tesla M6 Tesla M60
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
UHD Graphics 710 UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 770

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M4000 with UHD Graphics 770, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M4000
2015
8 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
17.19
+181%

M4000 outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by a whopping 181% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
UHD Graphics 770 UHD Graphics 770

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking325590
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.00no data
Power efficiency9.9728.38
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGM204Raptor Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date29 June 2015 (9 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$791 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1664256
Core clock speed773 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate80.3926.40
Floating-point processing power2.573 TFLOPS0.8448 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs10416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length241 mmno data
Width1" (2.5 cm)IGP
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1502 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidthUp to 192 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortMotherboard Dependent
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Syncno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.2-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M4000 17.19
+181%
UHD Graphics 770 6.12

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M4000 6668
+556%
UHD Graphics 770 1016

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
+163%
19
−163%
4K35−40
+150%
14
−150%

Cost per frame, $

1080p15.82no data
4K22.60no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
+0%
12
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+0%
5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 23
+0%
23
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 16
+0%
16
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6
+0%
6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 20
+0%
20
+0%
Far Cry 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18
+0%
18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
+0%
9
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
World of Tanks 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 40
+0%
40
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16
+0%
16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
World of Tanks 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14
+0%
14
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Fortnite 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how Quadro M4000 and UHD Graphics 770 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro M4000 is 163% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro M4000 is 150% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 test (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 17.19 6.12
Recency 29 June 2015 27 September 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 15 Watt

Quadro M4000 has a 180.9% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics 770, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 700% lower power consumption.

The Quadro M4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 770 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M4000 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro M4000
Quadro M4000
Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
vs
RTX A500 RTX A500
UHD Graphics 770 UHD Graphics 770
vs
RX 550X Radeon RX 550X
Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
vs
P106-100 P106 100
Pro W6800 AMD Pro W6800
vs
Quadro M4000 M4000
Pro W6600 AMD Pro W6600
vs
Quadro M4000 M4000
RTX A2000 Mobile NVIDIA A2000 Mobile
vs
Quadro M4000 M4000
RTX A2000 NVIDIA A2000
vs
Quadro M4000 M4000
RTX 3090 Ti NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
vs
Quadro M4000 M4000
T1000 8 GB NVIDIA 8 GB
vs
Quadro M4000 M4000
T400 4 GB NVIDIA 4 GB
vs
Quadro M4000 M4000
RTX A4500 NVIDIA A4500
vs
Quadro M4000 M4000
RX 6400 AMD RX 6400
vs
Quadro M4000 M4000
RTX A2000 12 GB NVIDIA A2000 12 GB
vs
Quadro M4000 M4000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 245 votes

Rate Quadro M4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1295 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.