GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs Quadro M2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro M2000 Quadro M3000 SE Quadro M4000 Quadro M5000 Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000 24 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
RTX 2050 Max-Q RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 2060 Mobile RTX 2060 Max-Q RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile RTX 2070 Mobile RTX 2070 Max-Q RTX 2070 Super Max-Q RTX 2080 Mobile RTX 2080 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M2000 with GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M2000
2016
4 GB 128-bit, 75 Watt
10.34

RTX 2060 Mobile outperforms M2000 by a whopping 194% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
RTX 2060 Mobile RTX 2060 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking436179
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.45no data
Power efficiency9.5718.38
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM206TU106
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date8 April 2016 (8 years ago)29 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$437.75 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681920
Core clock speed796 MHz960 MHz
Boost clock speed1163 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors2,940 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate55.82144.0
Floating-point processing power1.786 TFLOPS4.608 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs48120
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length201 mmno data
Width1" (2.5 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type128 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1653 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 106 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
VR Readyno data+
nView Desktop Management+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA5.27.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−237%
101
+237%
1440p18−21
−233%
60
+233%
4K14−16
−207%
43
+207%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 91
+0%
91
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 71
+0%
71
+0%
Battlefield 5 119
+0%
119
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 88
+0%
88
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 105
+0%
105
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 110
+0%
110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 366
+0%
366
+0%
Hitman 3 83
+0%
83
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 223
+0%
223
+0%
Metro Exodus 130
+0%
130
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100
+0%
100
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 148
+0%
148
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 227
+0%
227
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 107
+0%
107
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 56
+0%
56
+0%
Battlefield 5 105
+0%
105
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 79
+0%
79
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 85
+0%
85
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 82
+0%
82
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 280
+0%
280
+0%
Hitman 3 75
+0%
75
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 196
+0%
196
+0%
Metro Exodus 112
+0%
112
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75
+0%
75
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 123
+0%
123
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190
+0%
190
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50
+0%
50
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 48
+0%
48
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 58
+0%
58
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 62
+0%
62
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 88
+0%
88
+0%
Hitman 3 66
+0%
66
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 94
+0%
94
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 107
+0%
107
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+0%
60
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 38
+0%
38
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 79
+0%
79
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 54
+0%
54
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40
+0%
40
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 38
+0%
38
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 42
+0%
42
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 42
+0%
42
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 246
+0%
246
+0%
Hitman 3 46
+0%
46
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70
+0%
70
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 210
+0%
210
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 62
+0%
62
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 32
+0%
32
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30
+0%
30
+0%
Hitman 3 28
+0%
28
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 86
+0%
86
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+0%
39
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 25
+0%
25
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 22
+0%
22
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20
+0%
20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 15
+0%
15
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30
+0%
30
+0%

This is how Quadro M2000 and RTX 2060 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 Mobile is 237% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2060 Mobile is 233% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2060 Mobile is 207% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.34 30.43
Recency 8 April 2016 29 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 115 Watt

Quadro M2000 has 53.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 2060 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 194.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M2000 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro M2000
Quadro M2000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
vs
Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000
RTX 2060 Mobile GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
vs
RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
vs
FirePro D300 FirePro D300
NVS 810 NVS 810
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
NVS 810 NVS 810
vs
RTX 5000 Ada Generation RTX 5000 Ada Generation
Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
vs
GT 545 GeForce GT 545
Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
vs
HD 6610M Radeon HD 6610M
Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000
vs
GT 520 PCI GeForce GT 520 PCI
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
vs
E9173 PCIe Radeon E9173 PCIe
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
RTX A500 RTX A500
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
RTX A4500 Embedded RTX A4500 Embedded
M3000 SE Quadro M3000 SE
vs
RTX 3060 Mobile GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
GTX 980 SLI Mobile GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile
vs
RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 200 votes

Rate Quadro M2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1618 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.