Radeon RX Vega 10 vs Quadro M1200

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M1200 with Radeon RX Vega 10, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M1200
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 45 Watt
8.39
+97.9%

M1200 outperforms RX Vega 10 by an impressive 98% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking496675
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.3230.29
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGM107Raven
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date11 January 2017 (7 years ago)8 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640640
Core clock speed1093 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz1301 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate43.7252.04
Floating-point processing power1.399 TFLOPS1.665 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs4040

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)IGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1253 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth80 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA5.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M1200 8.39
+97.9%
RX Vega 10 4.24

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M1200 3238
+98%
RX Vega 10 1635

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro M1200 5310
+56.7%
RX Vega 10 3389

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro M1200 4142
+82.3%
RX Vega 10 2272

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro M1200 27557
+85.8%
RX Vega 10 14835

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro M1200 240298
+112%
RX Vega 10 113236

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

Quadro M1200 30
+19.9%
RX Vega 10 25

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD29
+81.3%
16
−81.3%
4K11
+120%
5−6
−120%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+8.3%
12
−8.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+133%
9
−133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12
+0%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+47.1%
17
−47.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+13.3%
15
−13.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+44.4%
9
−44.4%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+72.7%
11
−72.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+27.8%
18
−27.8%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+24.4%
45
−24.4%
Hitman 3 16−18
+77.8%
9
−77.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+71.4%
27−30
−71.4%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+19%
21
−19%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+21.1%
19
−21.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+40%
20
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−8.6%
63
+8.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+50%
14
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+50%
8
−50%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+213%
8
−213%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+21.4%
14
−21.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+160%
5
−160%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+111%
9
−111%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+229%
7
−229%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+64.7%
34
−64.7%
Hitman 3 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+71.4%
27−30
−71.4%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+38.9%
18
−38.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+35.3%
17
−35.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+100%
14
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+41.5%
41
−41.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+70%
10
−70%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+115%
24−27
−115%
Hitman 3 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+336%
11
−336%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+133%
12
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+62.5%
8
−62.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+31.8%
40−45
−31.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+109%
10−12
−109%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+467%
6−7
−467%
Hitman 3 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Metro Exodus 10−12 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+104%
24−27
−104%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Hitman 3 4−5 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

This is how Quadro M1200 and RX Vega 10 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro M1200 is 81% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro M1200 is 120% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro M1200 is 3100% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX Vega 10 is 9% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro M1200 is ahead in 63 tests (97%)
  • RX Vega 10 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.39 4.24
Recency 11 January 2017 8 January 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 10 Watt

Quadro M1200 has a 97.9% higher aggregate performance score.

RX Vega 10, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 350% lower power consumption.

The Quadro M1200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 10 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M1200 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX Vega 10 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Quadro M1200
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
Radeon RX Vega 10

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 331 vote

Rate Quadro M1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 1052 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.